The following was sent to us via the "Tell Us Your Story" form and posted with the users permission.
By Dilly:
At age 20, in Wisconsin (St. Croix county) I received a misdemeanor 4th Degree sexual conviction for having relations with 16 YR old who lied about her age. We dated for about 2 months and I had no earthly idea!! I was told I will not have to register as an offender at all. I later moved back to my hometown in Texas. After a routine traffic stop, I was told if I had a warrant in Minnesota and they wanted to extradite me. At that time I was then charged with failure to comply with offender registration. I was told I was charged for not letting MN know I was moving to TX (didn't know I had to if I wasn't supposed to be a registered offender in Texas or at all!!! Wasn't on any probation or anything). Which was a felony. Couple years later I missed by 2 weeks updating my address and then charged AGAIN felony failure to register. Now I have 2 felonies stemming from the Wisconsin misdemeanor. Is there a way I can get the misdemeanor off my record to put a end to all this madness in Texas? I'm 32 yrs old now. Legal help is needed!! PLEASE! This shouldn't be fair at all!!!!
New Life Style
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Wisconsin. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Wisconsin. Tampilkan semua postingan
Minggu, 05 Juli 2015
Selasa, 27 Januari 2015
WI - Cop (Jeffrey C. Hilgers) Caught With Hard Drives Full of Child Porn, Won’t Be Charged Because of a Typo
![]() |
Jeffrey C. Hilgers |
01/17/2015
By Matt Agorist
Dane County - A Dane County sheriff’s deputy miraculously escaped charges of child pornography, despite being caught with child pornography, because of a cut and paste error on a warrant.
In a tragic example of the broken “justice” system, former Dane County sheriff’s deputy Jeffrey C. Hilgers, 43, had seven counts of possession of child pornography dismissed Wednesday. The judge ruled that there was a fatal cut-and-paste error on a search warrant, thereby making the discovery of the illegal images on the deputy’s computers, inadmissible.
According to the report, investigators inadvertently used a paragraph, which stated they were searching for child pornography, instead of one specifying the search was for evidence in an illicit relationship between Hilgers and a woman serving a jail sentence at home on electronic monitoring.
The error was insurmountable, Dane County Circuit Judge John Markson said, so he had to suppress the search warrant along with a subsequent search warrant that was issued after child pornography was initially discovered, which led to the discovery of even more child pornography.
Label:
ChildPorn,
CrimePolice,
OffenderMale,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Dane County, WI, USA
Sabtu, 09 Agustus 2014
WI - Former sheriff's deputy (Jeffrey Hilgers) charged with sex assault, child porn
![]() |
Jeffrey C. Hilgers |
08/07/2014
By Ed Treleven
A former Dane County sheriff’s deputy who allegedly began a sexual relationship with a woman while she was in a jail diversion program was charged Thursday with second-degree sexual assault.
Jeffrey C. Hilgers, 42, of Madison, who resigned in August 2013 from the Dane County Sheriff’s Office, was also charged with seven counts of possessing child pornography, which was allegedly discovered on his computer as investigators searched it for evidence related to his alleged relationship with the former inmate.
According to a criminal complaint filed Thursday, Hilgers began a relationship in April 2013 with a 42-year-old woman who was in the Pathfinders Jail Diversion Program .
According to the complaint, at the time that Hilgers and the woman first met, she was an inmate in the Dane County Jail and he was assigned to the housing units where she was incarcerated. But the relationship didn’t begin until later, when the woman was at home on the diversion program.
State law forbids sexual contact between correctional officers and inmates because of the supervisory role the officers have over the inmates. In recent years, several guards have been convicted of having sexual relationships with inmates at state prisons.
Guards or correctional staff who have sex with inmates can be charged with second-degree sexual assault.
Hilgers appeared in court Thursday and was released on a signature bond. His lawyer, Brian Hough, declined to comment .
According to the complaint:
The woman told Pathfinders program manager Fran Augustine in May 2013 that she was in a relationship with a sheriff’s deputy who knew she was in Pathfinders.
The woman met with investigators and said that there was nothing going on between her and Hilgers while she was in the jail, where she said she hardly talked to him. But they ran into each other in April 2013 at Capitol Centre Foods and began talking, then exchanged phone numbers and email addresses. They met for coffee that day.
During the interview with investigators, the woman also said, “I just am so afraid that he’s going to get in trouble here and it’s really unwarranted.”
In the weeks that followed, their relationship included sex, she said, but she said she never felt as though he used his position as a sheriff’s deputy to pressure her into sex.
Hilgers told another sheriff’s deputy about the relationship on May 30, 2013, and said that nothing had happened while the woman was in the jail. Hilgers told Deputy Gerald King that the woman was supposed to get off the jail diversion program around April 30, 2013, but her release date was extended.
King told investigators that Hilgers didn’t seem to realize the gravity of the situation until King told him that the woman was still an inmate.
Hilgers told investigators that when he learned that the woman’s release date had been extended, he decided he couldn’t wait any longer and began to see her.
As part of the investigation, investigators got a search warrant and seized two computers from his house, looking for evidence of communication between Hilgers and the woman. A search of the computers turned up eight images considered to be child pornography.
Hilgers is alleged to have possessed the child pornography in July 2011, prior to an April 2012 change in state law that made child porn possession punishable by a mandatory minimum three years in prison.
For crimes before the change in law, there was a mandatory minimum three-year prison sentence, but the old law allowed judges to impose a lesser sentence or place offenders on probation if they believe the sentence is “in the best interests of the community and the public will not be harmed.”
Sabtu, 19 Juli 2014
WI - Milwaukee May Restrict Where Sex Offenders Can Live
Original Article
07/11/2014
By LATOYA DENNIS
The city may limit where ex-offenders can live, because many surrounding communities have done so, resulting in a high rate of placement in the city.
When sex offenders leave prison, state law demands that they return to the county where they had lived prior to incarceration. Nearly 90 percent of the sex offenders who came from Milwaukee County, now live in the City of Milwaukee, because of restrictions suburbs enacted.
Ald. Michael Murphy says the city asked the state to intervene, but because it has not, leaders here may also limit the neighborhoods where ex-offenders can live.
“You will have 117 locations to consider for your future placement, and in reality it will be more like 15 or less and what that impact will be to your operations,” Murphy says.
Under legislation a Common Council committee advanced Thursday, sex offenders could not live within 2,000 feet of a daycare, school, playground and other places where children congregate.
Murphy says if the full council agrees, there will only be one square mile within city limits where sex offenders could live.
Ald. Bob Bauman says while he has opposed residency limits in the past, they will now get his full support, for one reason.
“It increases the perception of Milwaukee as a crime infested second rate place to live and the suburbs are great and look, we can keep out all the undesirable people. And I’m just sick and tired of that paradigm being in place. And the state seems unconcerned because these are Republican suburbs by in large, and heaven forbid those representatives are going to take on these uniform residency rules. So enough is enough the city is going to join the party and it’s your problem now,” Bauman says.
The state Department of Corrections had a representative on hand at Thursday’s hearing, Melissa Roberts. She says if the map for placements changes, authorities could lose track of sex offenders. Right now, many do reside in the city, and police know where.
“The intent of the sex offender registry is to know where sex offenders live and to be able to provide that information to the general public and to law enforcement. Where there are registry restrictions in place and sex offenders don’t have a place to live we obviously have increased homelessness. So we do not know where they live and cannot follow them,” Roberts says.
Roberts says sex offenders are more of a danger to the public when they’re off the grid versus being monitored. When it comes to complaints about the high concentration of sex offenders placed in Milwaukee, Roberts says the majority are from the city.
The issue will come before the full board on July 22.
07/11/2014
By LATOYA DENNIS
The city may limit where ex-offenders can live, because many surrounding communities have done so, resulting in a high rate of placement in the city.
When sex offenders leave prison, state law demands that they return to the county where they had lived prior to incarceration. Nearly 90 percent of the sex offenders who came from Milwaukee County, now live in the City of Milwaukee, because of restrictions suburbs enacted.
Ald. Michael Murphy says the city asked the state to intervene, but because it has not, leaders here may also limit the neighborhoods where ex-offenders can live.
“You will have 117 locations to consider for your future placement, and in reality it will be more like 15 or less and what that impact will be to your operations,” Murphy says.
Under legislation a Common Council committee advanced Thursday, sex offenders could not live within 2,000 feet of a daycare, school, playground and other places where children congregate.
Murphy says if the full council agrees, there will only be one square mile within city limits where sex offenders could live.
Ald. Bob Bauman says while he has opposed residency limits in the past, they will now get his full support, for one reason.
“It increases the perception of Milwaukee as a crime infested second rate place to live and the suburbs are great and look, we can keep out all the undesirable people. And I’m just sick and tired of that paradigm being in place. And the state seems unconcerned because these are Republican suburbs by in large, and heaven forbid those representatives are going to take on these uniform residency rules. So enough is enough the city is going to join the party and it’s your problem now,” Bauman says.
The state Department of Corrections had a representative on hand at Thursday’s hearing, Melissa Roberts. She says if the map for placements changes, authorities could lose track of sex offenders. Right now, many do reside in the city, and police know where.
“The intent of the sex offender registry is to know where sex offenders live and to be able to provide that information to the general public and to law enforcement. Where there are registry restrictions in place and sex offenders don’t have a place to live we obviously have increased homelessness. So we do not know where they live and cannot follow them,” Roberts says.
Roberts says sex offenders are more of a danger to the public when they’re off the grid versus being monitored. When it comes to complaints about the high concentration of sex offenders placed in Milwaukee, Roberts says the majority are from the city.
The issue will come before the full board on July 22.
Lokasi:
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Rabu, 25 Juni 2014
WI - Help me
The following was sent to us via the "Tell Us Your Story" form and posted with the users permission.
By Joey Oneill:
17 years ago I made a horrible decision, so absolutely wrong that to this day it makes me sick just thinking about it. I don’t like to talk about it, I coward when confronted with it. I feel like I have to hide in the shadows and hope no one will recognize me. I’m afraid most of the time. This is how I feel today 17 years later; I pray to god that he takes me away.
17 years ago I had consented sex with a 15 year old girl, her parents didn’t feel the same way. I was convicted of 2nd degree sexual assault of a child. I have never done anything like that before or since. I do not want to get into the circumstances of what happened, I give you permission to get all of my court records. I would like to concentrate on who I’ve become since then.
16 years ago I met my late wife; she was a beautiful and caring person that was my soul mate. We were married in 2002 for 8 years, we were together for 12 and we lived at _____ for them 12 years. She passed away in 2010 of breast cancer. I continued to live at this address for 4 more years; the house was foreclosed on 2014. We add a good marriage and we loved each other very much. For the last four years I have helped run a fundraiser to benefit a local breast cancer victims, we have raised over $15,000. I participate in the dragon boat races which benefits cancer victims, I rock for a reason which is another benefit for cancer, and I grow my hair to donate to locks of love. I have not been in any trouble for over 15 years, not so much as a speeding ticket. I have for the last 17 years done everything they have asked me to do. My sentence was 4 months in jail and 4 years’ probation which was completed in 2001 along with all the groups they had me go to and all of the fines that I had to pay.
I could not afford the house after my wife died and the kids didn’t make it any easier. When I received the letter telling me, I have to vacate the house. I panicked and told the truth on my last report to the sex offender registry; that I was homeless and that I was thinking about moving out of state which is just over the bridge, I didn’t move out of state but I am still homeless. I did not know that I was required to report once a week, once when I became homeless, I stay with family and friends and sometimes in my car, I never stay to long cause I don’t think it’s fair to label my family and friends houses with my label (sex offender). I cannot find a job or a place to live because of this crime I commented 17 years ago. Things were getting bad and I needed help so I contacted the department of correction to see if they could help me with some housing. I had just applied for disability and for low income housing. I was denied housing because of my crime and I could appeal but I needed proof that I was better, and the only proof I thought I could get was from the department of correction that’s why I contacted them. First I contacted them over the phone and the lady in Madison WI, told me that she had sent a referral to the DA, because I was non complaint because I’m supposed to report once a week because I was homeless. So I asked her if I should go and turn myself in, the lady in Madison said no but gave me another number to call so I called and that lady was not going to be in for a couple of days. My phone ran out of minute so I decided to go talk to her directly to straighten this out and ask for help with housing. I went to the probation office to get ahold of the second lady but the police came and arrested me did not read me my rights or let me make a phone call, the next day I went to court and the referral said that I have to report all changes within 10 days and they don’t believe that I am homeless because I have had no contact with the police. Now I am looking at $10,000 fine and or 6 years in prison for something I didn’t know I had to do. For 17 years I reported and if I had known that I had to report once a week once I became homeless I surly would have done so.
I just can’t tell you how much this is affecting my life, how tortured I feel. I know what I did was wrong and I’m very ashamed and sorry for what I did, but it was a mistake and I have paid for that mistake over and over again. I am not suicidal but I am looking for a way out because I cannot live this way for the rest of my life. Every time I have to tell people that I am a sex offender I die a little inside. I have tell people every time I go for job interview, move, or if I want to date. The depressions is getting worse, I can’t seem to focus on anything else. I am normally a happy person but I can’t see the end of this and I have thought about suicide, I.ve went so far as to right a suicide note, and found a weapon to do it with. But want to live and fight, but I need help with this fight.
Please help me
By Joey Oneill:
17 years ago I made a horrible decision, so absolutely wrong that to this day it makes me sick just thinking about it. I don’t like to talk about it, I coward when confronted with it. I feel like I have to hide in the shadows and hope no one will recognize me. I’m afraid most of the time. This is how I feel today 17 years later; I pray to god that he takes me away.
17 years ago I had consented sex with a 15 year old girl, her parents didn’t feel the same way. I was convicted of 2nd degree sexual assault of a child. I have never done anything like that before or since. I do not want to get into the circumstances of what happened, I give you permission to get all of my court records. I would like to concentrate on who I’ve become since then.
16 years ago I met my late wife; she was a beautiful and caring person that was my soul mate. We were married in 2002 for 8 years, we were together for 12 and we lived at _____ for them 12 years. She passed away in 2010 of breast cancer. I continued to live at this address for 4 more years; the house was foreclosed on 2014. We add a good marriage and we loved each other very much. For the last four years I have helped run a fundraiser to benefit a local breast cancer victims, we have raised over $15,000. I participate in the dragon boat races which benefits cancer victims, I rock for a reason which is another benefit for cancer, and I grow my hair to donate to locks of love. I have not been in any trouble for over 15 years, not so much as a speeding ticket. I have for the last 17 years done everything they have asked me to do. My sentence was 4 months in jail and 4 years’ probation which was completed in 2001 along with all the groups they had me go to and all of the fines that I had to pay.
I could not afford the house after my wife died and the kids didn’t make it any easier. When I received the letter telling me, I have to vacate the house. I panicked and told the truth on my last report to the sex offender registry; that I was homeless and that I was thinking about moving out of state which is just over the bridge, I didn’t move out of state but I am still homeless. I did not know that I was required to report once a week, once when I became homeless, I stay with family and friends and sometimes in my car, I never stay to long cause I don’t think it’s fair to label my family and friends houses with my label (sex offender). I cannot find a job or a place to live because of this crime I commented 17 years ago. Things were getting bad and I needed help so I contacted the department of correction to see if they could help me with some housing. I had just applied for disability and for low income housing. I was denied housing because of my crime and I could appeal but I needed proof that I was better, and the only proof I thought I could get was from the department of correction that’s why I contacted them. First I contacted them over the phone and the lady in Madison WI, told me that she had sent a referral to the DA, because I was non complaint because I’m supposed to report once a week because I was homeless. So I asked her if I should go and turn myself in, the lady in Madison said no but gave me another number to call so I called and that lady was not going to be in for a couple of days. My phone ran out of minute so I decided to go talk to her directly to straighten this out and ask for help with housing. I went to the probation office to get ahold of the second lady but the police came and arrested me did not read me my rights or let me make a phone call, the next day I went to court and the referral said that I have to report all changes within 10 days and they don’t believe that I am homeless because I have had no contact with the police. Now I am looking at $10,000 fine and or 6 years in prison for something I didn’t know I had to do. For 17 years I reported and if I had known that I had to report once a week once I became homeless I surly would have done so.
I just can’t tell you how much this is affecting my life, how tortured I feel. I know what I did was wrong and I’m very ashamed and sorry for what I did, but it was a mistake and I have paid for that mistake over and over again. I am not suicidal but I am looking for a way out because I cannot live this way for the rest of my life. Every time I have to tell people that I am a sex offender I die a little inside. I have tell people every time I go for job interview, move, or if I want to date. The depressions is getting worse, I can’t seem to focus on anything else. I am normally a happy person but I can’t see the end of this and I have thought about suicide, I.ve went so far as to right a suicide note, and found a weapon to do it with. But want to live and fight, but I need help with this fight.
Please help me
Label:
UserSubmitted,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Superior, WI, USA
Minggu, 15 Juni 2014
WI - Council Workshop - Sex Offender Placements
Lokasi:
Oshkosh, WI, USA
Kamis, 12 Juni 2014
WI - Proposed sex offender ordinance up for debate in Milwaukee
Original Article
06/11/2014
By Michele McCormack
MILWAUKEE - On the eve of a committee hearing about a new sex offender ordinance Alderman Terry Witkowski is taking issue with his fellow council member, Tony Zielinski's, proposal.
"This plan is not a very balanced plan to say the least," Witkowski told CBS 58 investigative reporter Sarah Barwacz.
While Alderman Witkowski says it's important to regulate where sex offender live and hang out, under Zielinski's proposal nearly half of the city's available housing units for convicted sex offender's would be in Witkowski's 13th Aldermanic District.
A CBS 58 News Bottom Line Investigation in May exposed the lack of restriction on where offenders stay.
Reporter Sarah Barwacz broke the story just weeks later about Zielinski, who represents the 14th district, proposing a two thousand feet buffer zone from schools and parks.
When Sarah questioned Witkowski about his district having fewer schools, the council member said that doesn't mean there aren't children around.
"I think you have to look at what's the perception from neighbors here," Witkowski explained. "Are you saying there's less children just because the school isn't within walking distance or two thousand feet? I can guarantee you I got a call from a person indicating that they've got a sexual predator living next door who watches his daughter get off the school bus."
- Imagine if we made and passed all laws based on PERCEPTION!
The Common Council’s Steering and Rules Committee meets Thursday, June 12th in room 301-B at City Hall at 1:30 p.m.
See Also:
06/11/2014
By Michele McCormack
MILWAUKEE - On the eve of a committee hearing about a new sex offender ordinance Alderman Terry Witkowski is taking issue with his fellow council member, Tony Zielinski's, proposal.
"This plan is not a very balanced plan to say the least," Witkowski told CBS 58 investigative reporter Sarah Barwacz.
While Alderman Witkowski says it's important to regulate where sex offender live and hang out, under Zielinski's proposal nearly half of the city's available housing units for convicted sex offender's would be in Witkowski's 13th Aldermanic District.
A CBS 58 News Bottom Line Investigation in May exposed the lack of restriction on where offenders stay.
Reporter Sarah Barwacz broke the story just weeks later about Zielinski, who represents the 14th district, proposing a two thousand feet buffer zone from schools and parks.
When Sarah questioned Witkowski about his district having fewer schools, the council member said that doesn't mean there aren't children around.
"I think you have to look at what's the perception from neighbors here," Witkowski explained. "Are you saying there's less children just because the school isn't within walking distance or two thousand feet? I can guarantee you I got a call from a person indicating that they've got a sexual predator living next door who watches his daughter get off the school bus."
- Imagine if we made and passed all laws based on PERCEPTION!
The Common Council’s Steering and Rules Committee meets Thursday, June 12th in room 301-B at City Hall at 1:30 p.m.
See Also:
Lokasi:
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Minggu, 09 Februari 2014
WI - Freed, but still in jail: New limits on sex offenders leave them in care of sheriff
Original Article
So he's done his time but because he couldn't find a place to stay, behind bars, he will remain behind bars? That is just so wrong!
02/08/2014
By Stephanie Jones
RACINE - _____ is supposed to be free. He’s not.
_____, a convicted sex offender, served his time and was supposed to be released from the New Lisbon Correctional Institution on Jan. 28. He was released on schedule, but his release was not to freedom. It was to the Racine County Jail. There was nowhere else for him to go.
“It was a rather depressing situation,” he said about finding out the jail was his only housing option. “All I wanted was a place to live.”
Municipal ordinances have become so restrictive on where registered sex offenders like _____ can live in the county that state officials have directed the jail to hold him. It’s not clear how or when he’ll get out.
This is a new problem resulting from recent sex offender ordinances and it’s concerning, said Lt. Dan Adams of the Racine County Sheriff’s Office.
In early January, _____, 59, was planning on moving into a transitional residence in the 2100 block of Racine Street in Mount Pleasant. Then those plans changed when the Mount Pleasant Village Board passed an ordinance Jan. 13 greatly restricting where sex offenders can live. That ordinance came on the heels of similar ordinances passed in Racine, Sturtevant and Caledonia.
Mount Pleasant’s new ordinance effectively eliminated the home _____ had lined up, which is near a church.
“That was the last oasis,” Adams said about the Racine Street residence. “Then the ordinance passed. Now we are in this predicament.”
It’s not an issue that other released prisoners face, he said, because they have alternative shelters where they can stay that sex offenders cannot.
Staying at the Homeless Assistance Leadership Organization shelter also is not an option for sex offenders. Because families and children stay at the shelter, they don’t accept sex offenders except for particular circumstances such as if there is an 18-year-old who had a relationship with a 17-year-old, said Stephanie Koeber, HALO’s family program and child care director. She didn’t know offhand of any other place that will take sex offenders now.
“It’s definitely a population that is underserved,” she said.
_____ doesn’t try to justify the mistakes he made, he said. When he committed his first offense in 2000, he was living in Indiana with his wife and five children. He used to write articles for the Elkhart Truth’s sports department, he said, and he owned his own business that sold new and used equipment to fire departments.
Then he started an online relationship with a person who he thought was a 14-year-old boy, he said. He drove from Indiana to Racine County to meet the boy at the McDonald’s by Interstate 94 at 13343 Washington Ave. It turned out it was an undercover agent, and _____ was taken into custody.
Years later after he was released from prison for that crime, he ended up arrested again in 2007 after he was caught looking at a website at the Racine Public Library called “Barely Legal.” He said it turned out some of the photos were of teens under 18. He admits it was a stupid decision, although he claims he thought they were adults.
Now, after being released again, _____ is on extended supervision and he has a GPS monitor on his ankle, which he said he may have to wear for the rest of his life. His first goal is to find a job so that he can afford housing, he said Thursday while seated at the Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections office in Sturtevant, with a notebook filled with possible job leads.
That is where he spends the day for the most part. _____ said his day starts with breakfast at the jail, then he gets a packed lunch and is transported to the Sturtevant corrections office, where he spends time looking for jobs until he is transported back to the jail before dinner. He is required to return to jail each night, Adams said.
Joy Staab, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, said for sex offenders who warrant special notifications to law enforcement, the current policy is to “utilize jail in lieu of homelessness.”
This is a statewide policy, she said, although she did not know if it is occurring anywhere else outside of Racine County.
“As a result of local ordinances restricting where sex offenders can reside, housing options can be very limited for sex offenders,” she said.
According to the Sheriff’s Office, one additional sex offender in _____’s situation also has been housed in the Racine County Jail since Tuesday. Both men are listed in jail online records with their “hold reason” as “homeless sex offender.” It’s not clear how long the offenders will have to stay in jail, Adams said. The state will pay for the jail stays, he added. “I think there is some concern about what comes next,” he said. “There has to be some alternative solution because I don’t think this can be sustainable.”
In the two weeks since _____ was released from prison, he hasn’t had any luck finding work, he said. Until he gets a job, he doesn’t know how he will be able to afford rent, he said, and with the transitional facility no longer an option, he is not sure when he will be able to finally spend a night outside jail.
If he had money in the bank, possibly he could find someplace that the ordinance would allow a sex offender to live. But he doesn’t, and he is not sure where he could find housing.
“I’m not trying to look for sympathy. I don’t expect that,” he said. But he said, “I did my prison time. Give me an opportunity. Allow me to try to put my life back together.”
See Also:
So he's done his time but because he couldn't find a place to stay, behind bars, he will remain behind bars? That is just so wrong!
02/08/2014
By Stephanie Jones
RACINE - _____ is supposed to be free. He’s not.
_____, a convicted sex offender, served his time and was supposed to be released from the New Lisbon Correctional Institution on Jan. 28. He was released on schedule, but his release was not to freedom. It was to the Racine County Jail. There was nowhere else for him to go.
“It was a rather depressing situation,” he said about finding out the jail was his only housing option. “All I wanted was a place to live.”
Municipal ordinances have become so restrictive on where registered sex offenders like _____ can live in the county that state officials have directed the jail to hold him. It’s not clear how or when he’ll get out.
This is a new problem resulting from recent sex offender ordinances and it’s concerning, said Lt. Dan Adams of the Racine County Sheriff’s Office.
No options
In early January, _____, 59, was planning on moving into a transitional residence in the 2100 block of Racine Street in Mount Pleasant. Then those plans changed when the Mount Pleasant Village Board passed an ordinance Jan. 13 greatly restricting where sex offenders can live. That ordinance came on the heels of similar ordinances passed in Racine, Sturtevant and Caledonia.
Mount Pleasant’s new ordinance effectively eliminated the home _____ had lined up, which is near a church.
“That was the last oasis,” Adams said about the Racine Street residence. “Then the ordinance passed. Now we are in this predicament.”
It’s not an issue that other released prisoners face, he said, because they have alternative shelters where they can stay that sex offenders cannot.
Staying at the Homeless Assistance Leadership Organization shelter also is not an option for sex offenders. Because families and children stay at the shelter, they don’t accept sex offenders except for particular circumstances such as if there is an 18-year-old who had a relationship with a 17-year-old, said Stephanie Koeber, HALO’s family program and child care director. She didn’t know offhand of any other place that will take sex offenders now.
“It’s definitely a population that is underserved,” she said.
Past mistakes
_____ doesn’t try to justify the mistakes he made, he said. When he committed his first offense in 2000, he was living in Indiana with his wife and five children. He used to write articles for the Elkhart Truth’s sports department, he said, and he owned his own business that sold new and used equipment to fire departments.
Then he started an online relationship with a person who he thought was a 14-year-old boy, he said. He drove from Indiana to Racine County to meet the boy at the McDonald’s by Interstate 94 at 13343 Washington Ave. It turned out it was an undercover agent, and _____ was taken into custody.
Years later after he was released from prison for that crime, he ended up arrested again in 2007 after he was caught looking at a website at the Racine Public Library called “Barely Legal.” He said it turned out some of the photos were of teens under 18. He admits it was a stupid decision, although he claims he thought they were adults.
What’s next?
Now, after being released again, _____ is on extended supervision and he has a GPS monitor on his ankle, which he said he may have to wear for the rest of his life. His first goal is to find a job so that he can afford housing, he said Thursday while seated at the Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections office in Sturtevant, with a notebook filled with possible job leads.
That is where he spends the day for the most part. _____ said his day starts with breakfast at the jail, then he gets a packed lunch and is transported to the Sturtevant corrections office, where he spends time looking for jobs until he is transported back to the jail before dinner. He is required to return to jail each night, Adams said.
Joy Staab, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, said for sex offenders who warrant special notifications to law enforcement, the current policy is to “utilize jail in lieu of homelessness.”
This is a statewide policy, she said, although she did not know if it is occurring anywhere else outside of Racine County.
“As a result of local ordinances restricting where sex offenders can reside, housing options can be very limited for sex offenders,” she said.
Another man at jail
According to the Sheriff’s Office, one additional sex offender in _____’s situation also has been housed in the Racine County Jail since Tuesday. Both men are listed in jail online records with their “hold reason” as “homeless sex offender.” It’s not clear how long the offenders will have to stay in jail, Adams said. The state will pay for the jail stays, he added. “I think there is some concern about what comes next,” he said. “There has to be some alternative solution because I don’t think this can be sustainable.”
In the two weeks since _____ was released from prison, he hasn’t had any luck finding work, he said. Until he gets a job, he doesn’t know how he will be able to afford rent, he said, and with the transitional facility no longer an option, he is not sure when he will be able to finally spend a night outside jail.
If he had money in the bank, possibly he could find someplace that the ordinance would allow a sex offender to live. But he doesn’t, and he is not sure where he could find housing.
“I’m not trying to look for sympathy. I don’t expect that,” he said. But he said, “I did my prison time. Give me an opportunity. Allow me to try to put my life back together.”
See Also:
- (02/25/2014) Homeless sex offender given temporary housing
Lokasi:
Racine, WI, USA
Rabu, 05 Februari 2014
WI - Schools test system to identify sex offenders
Original Article
02/04/2014
By Jeremy Ross
WAUWATOSA (WITI) - New technology tracks who is inside schools, and can help keep pedophiles out. The system is already in some buildings in Illinois, and it’s being tested in at least two districts locally.
- Sex offender doesn't equal pedophile and we wish the media would stop using the term.
Betty Marks is the first line of defense at Wauwatosa West High School.
“I take it very seriously. I’ve got a building full of over 1,000 students and staff members that I care for,” Marks said.
It is part of Marks’ job to screen people who enter the school, and for the past few months, she’s been testing a visitor management system made by Raptor. Each person entering the building must present a state ID.
The card information is scanned, and the visitor’s image, destination and check-in time is printed on a sticker and recorded in a database.
Oconomowoc’s Principal Joseph Moylan is testing the system as well — and says it allows schools to get a real-time snapshot of who is inside the building in the event of a fire.
As the system checks people in, Raptor’s website says the information is checked against the sex offender databases in all 50 states.
Matt Newman manages the buildings in Oconomowoc, and says if a name matches that of a sex offender, administrators are immediately alerted by email or text message.
The total setup costs the district about $12,000, but critics may argue the sex offender database is free of charge to use.
Additionally, even if the Raptor system was in place for years, it wouldn’t have stopped people like 43-year-old _____.
_____ had no prior criminal record before he was convicted of first degree child sexual assault.
In April of 2012, he was volunteering in an Oconomowoc elementary school when he was accused of fondling a young girl.
“Nothing is going to catch everybody who did this, but it’s the best effort in making sure kids are safe,” Oconomowoc Principal Joseph Moylan said.
Wauwatosa’s Safety Coordinator Dale Weiss has plans to roll out the system in all 16 schools. He says the district can take advantage of customized alerts — warning staff about problems outside the classroom, such as expelled students trying to get back in.
“It’s one more step to let them know we’re watching,” Weiss said.
However, there is no guarantee of complete security.
“If someone wants in, they’re going to come in. I’m not sure any of this automation or me are going to stop them,” Marks said.
Educators say the technology helps schools get in line with a new state law demanding sex offenders give schools proper notice if they make a visit.
Both districts say checking for offenders is only a small part of what the total system offers.
02/04/2014
By Jeremy Ross
WAUWATOSA (WITI) - New technology tracks who is inside schools, and can help keep pedophiles out. The system is already in some buildings in Illinois, and it’s being tested in at least two districts locally.
- Sex offender doesn't equal pedophile and we wish the media would stop using the term.
Betty Marks is the first line of defense at Wauwatosa West High School.
“I take it very seriously. I’ve got a building full of over 1,000 students and staff members that I care for,” Marks said.
It is part of Marks’ job to screen people who enter the school, and for the past few months, she’s been testing a visitor management system made by Raptor. Each person entering the building must present a state ID.
The card information is scanned, and the visitor’s image, destination and check-in time is printed on a sticker and recorded in a database.
Oconomowoc’s Principal Joseph Moylan is testing the system as well — and says it allows schools to get a real-time snapshot of who is inside the building in the event of a fire.
As the system checks people in, Raptor’s website says the information is checked against the sex offender databases in all 50 states.
Matt Newman manages the buildings in Oconomowoc, and says if a name matches that of a sex offender, administrators are immediately alerted by email or text message.
The total setup costs the district about $12,000, but critics may argue the sex offender database is free of charge to use.
Additionally, even if the Raptor system was in place for years, it wouldn’t have stopped people like 43-year-old _____.
_____ had no prior criminal record before he was convicted of first degree child sexual assault.
In April of 2012, he was volunteering in an Oconomowoc elementary school when he was accused of fondling a young girl.
“Nothing is going to catch everybody who did this, but it’s the best effort in making sure kids are safe,” Oconomowoc Principal Joseph Moylan said.
Wauwatosa’s Safety Coordinator Dale Weiss has plans to roll out the system in all 16 schools. He says the district can take advantage of customized alerts — warning staff about problems outside the classroom, such as expelled students trying to get back in.
“It’s one more step to let them know we’re watching,” Weiss said.
However, there is no guarantee of complete security.
“If someone wants in, they’re going to come in. I’m not sure any of this automation or me are going to stop them,” Marks said.
Educators say the technology helps schools get in line with a new state law demanding sex offenders give schools proper notice if they make a visit.
Both districts say checking for offenders is only a small part of what the total system offers.
Lokasi:
Wauwatosa, WI, USA
WI - Sex-offender limits debated
![]() |
Dumping ground |
02/05/2014
By Mark Schaaf
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS WONDER WHETHER COUNTYWIDE ORDINANCE WOULD WORK
RACINE COUNTY - With restrictions on where sex offenders can live in place in some Racine County communities but not in others, county officials have begun discussions on a residency ordinance that would apply to the entire county.
A few challenges emerged in initial talks, including the fact that every Racine County municipality would have to agree to the ordinance — no easy task if the proposed county restrictions differed with local ordinances already in place.
The county also needs to address who would enforce the ordinance — whether it would be the Sheriff’s Office or local police departments — and the state Department of Corrections has raised concerns that it would drive sex offenders to homelessness, making them more difficult to track.
But Mount Pleasant Village President Mark Gleason, who also serves on the County Board and has pushed for a countywide ordinance, said passing the law would ensure no community becomes a “dumping ground” for sex offenders.
The idea has generated interest among Racine County community leaders, Gleason said, as it would create a “level playing field” across the county.
He and other Mount Pleasant officials spoke Tuesday to the county Government Services Committee. No action was taken as the county’s corporation counsel and other departments continue to examine the issue and compare local ordinances.
“We’re at that first stage of finding out whether or not this is an option for the county,” Gleason said.
Mount Pleasant passed an ordinance last month prohibiting sex offenders from living near any place children gather, including schools, parks, day care centers, athletic fields, playgrounds and churches. The minimum distance they must live away from those places is 1,000 feet or 2,500 feet, depending on the category of the offender.
The village approved its rules mostly because Racine, Caledonia and Sturtevant put restrictions in place that were driving sex offenders to Mount Pleasant, police Capt. Brian Smith told the committee.
“What we were seeing in Mount Pleasant was the fact that these men, who were sexual predators preying on young kids, all of a sudden being dumped in our community,” Smith said.
Whether a countywide ordinance would prevent that from happening in other communities is still to be determined.
Burlington Mayor Bob Miller said he is leery about countywide restrictions. The city enacted an ordinance a few years ago restricting sex offenders from living near places such as parks, schools and churches, but it would be moot if a countywide ordinance is passed.
“I would have to see what the proposal ends up being or somehow be involved. Sometimes these one-size-fits-all laws don’t really work that well for everybody,” Miller said. “If Racine has a lot of offenders and we don’t have that many and we end up with their offenders coming here, I got an issue with something like that.”
Waterford, meanwhile, does not have an ordinance on the books. The village researched and reviewed the issue several years ago, but the Village Board decided not to move forward.
Waterford is only 2-1/2 square miles, which makes it challenging to find parameters for restrictions, Village Administrator Rebecca Ewald said.
She said she couldn’t comment on a possible countywide ordinance until seeing it.
Lokasi:
Racine, WI, USA
Selasa, 04 Februari 2014
WI - Sex offender awaits second chance
![]() |
Dianne Hendrickson |
02/04/2014
By NORA G. HERTEL
Dianne Hendrickson misses her son, who at age 39 has been locked up for more than half his life. He finished his criminal sentence and was committed to the state as a sexually violent person in 2002.
_____ has been confined more than twice as long as his original sentence and is now held for the future risk he poses, not for past crimes.
“I think it’s wrong to take away someone’s freedom for something someone has not done,” said Dianne, who adopted _____, her only child, at birth.
_____ is locked up at the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, which holds the state’s committed sexually violent people, under Chapter 980. The 1994 state law allows the state to hold sex offenders with mental disorders in a treatment institution indefinitely after serving time in prison.
During the past two decades, the law has been used to confine about 500 people, most at Sand Ridge. About a third have been released, although the number of former patients on intensive supervision has been rising steadily in recent years. Individuals on supervised release receive ongoing treatment and monitoring.
Neither _____ nor his mother wants to challenge the commitment law. But both believe his crime did not warrant such a punishment and that he has been held over time for his use of marijuana and contraband in the institution rather than for his risk as a sex offender.
“I have never been given the opportunity to regain my place in society,” _____ wrote last summer in a letter to the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism.
Deborah McCulloch, director of Sand Ridge, said many patients feel they do not belong there. Many, she added, could have been released “had they gotten down to business” — that is, successfully progressed in treatment. But she recognizes that treatment is difficult for patients at Sand Ridge.
Staff members expressed confidence that their assessment models work well and that they are based on the most current scientific research. A recent update to the state’s recidivism assessment model is allowing and will continue to allow more Sand Ridge patients to be released.
Risk factors
_____ was convicted in 1994, at age 19, of second-degree sexual assault and other charges. The victim of his primary charge was a woman, a stranger, whom Hendrickson attacked in the summer of 1993.
He was on temporary release from the Marathon County Jail to do community service, and he said in an interview that he had gotten high on homemade methadone. He forced the woman down, while masturbating, and grabbed her breasts and between her legs.
_____ was sentenced to 10 years in prison, followed by three years on probation. In 2001, he was about to be released under the sentencing laws at the time. As his mandatory sentence came to an end, the state petitioned to have _____ indefinitely committed under the state’s sexually violent persons law. He was moved to Sand Ridge in 2002.
“I committed a crime true enough but I am now being held for something I might do in the future,” _____ wrote in his letter.
_____ has petitioned for discharge three times and brought other legal challenges. He thinks he might have been released by now were it not for breaking rules at Sand Ridge, including use of marijuana and tobacco.
“I seen guys with worse records than me go home,” said _____, pointing out that he has a single violent crime on his record.
He thinks his recidivism risk was overestimated because he was young and inexperienced when he committed the crime.
Factors considered in the evaluation, Sand Ridge officials said, include age and life experience. Long-term employment and intimate relationships improve an offender’s rating, but _____ did not have much of a job or relationship history when he was first imprisoned.
The state’s applications of assessment measures “don’t always apply equally to individuals,” said Robert Peterson, a Racine attorney who has successfully represented Sand Ridge patients in their petitions for release, including four current clients on supervised release in Milwaukee. Hendrickson is not one of his clients.
Some individuals, Peterson said, “can be caught up in situations that aren’t truly indicative of their risk.”
A diverse group
Dianne Hendrickson can sympathize with the judges and juries who agree to commit offenders like her son past the end of their prison terms.
“Everybody rules on the side of caution, and if I didn’t know better, I probably would too,” she said.
But _____ and another Sand Ridge patient interviewed for this article allege that their mental disorder diagnoses, a condition for commitment, only arose when they were preparing to finish their criminal sentences.
When asked about _____’s mental health history, Dianne replied, “he doesn’t have one.”
They both refer to _____’s diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder as contrived.
“I never heard that once in prison,” _____ said about his diagnosis.
Medical records were not available to independently verify these patients’ mental health histories.
Lloyd Sinclair, Sand Ridge’s court assessment and community programs director, said just because a patient never had an official mental disorder diagnosis, it “doesn’t necessarily mean he didn’t have” a disorder.
Attorney Peterson said patients who are committed after being sentenced face a double whammy. At trial, they are deemed to be sane and therefore fully responsible for their crimes and sentenced accordingly. But when that sentence comes to an end, they are deemed to have a mental disorder, unable to control their behavior.
“That is a tough pill for a lot of people to swallow,” he said.
Each state can define mental illness for its own statutes. The majority of Sand Ridge patients have personality disorders and paraphilias, atypical sexual desires, including exhibitionism, sadomasochism and pedophilia. About 10 percent have serious mental illnesses, such as bipolar disorder.
“A reasonable estimate is more than 80 percent of patients came here with a diagnosis of a serious substance abuse or dependence,” said R. Keith Ramsey, Sand Ridge treatment supervisor.
Sand Ridge director McCulloch cautioned that “no one patient can represent our patient population,” which is “really quite diverse.”
McCulloch said that Sand Ridge has never offered alcohol and drug abuse treatment for patients, only assessment and support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous. Officials say they are working on starting a treatment program.
“That is a real big issue for me,” Dianne Hendrickson said. “That is something that could have helped _____ and a lot of other guys there.”
“They’ve been talking about adding an AODA (Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse) treatment program there for years,” she added.
Time to go?
_____ is now in phase two of his treatment, out of three offered in the facility. He has taken some correspondence courses and hopes to pursue horticulture when he is released. His mother and friends vouch for him and say he will not reoffend.
Of the first 67 offenders released after being committed, through March 2010, more than 70 percent did not commit additional crimes within three years. Five of these, less than 10 percent, were convicted of sex crimes.
- Even without civil commitment the recidivism for ex-offenders is low, about 5% or less.
Sinclair said there is no doubt that the commitment program has made the state safer.
“Chapter 980 identifies the most likely individuals to reoffend sexually over the course of their lifetimes,” Sinclair said. “And if you incapacitate that number of people, you are taking the highest risk individuals off the streets. Ideally, you’re doing a lot more than incapacitating them. You’re rehabilitating them, you’re treating them.”
_____ believes he has grown as a person at Sand Ridge and looks forward to being released. “I’m doing what’s expected of me and following the rules,” he said.
Dianne Hendrickson is also eager to see her son come home. “I have never prayed or wished for anything more than that.”
Minggu, 02 Februari 2014
WI - Wisconsin freeing more sex offenders from mental lockup

02/02/2014
By Nora G. Hertel
Wisconsin officials have nearly quadrupled the number of offenders released from state custody after they were committed as sexually violent persons.
The risks to residents are reasonable, officials say, because the state's treatment programs are working and new data suggest these offenders are less likely to reoffend than previously thought.
- New data? Studies have been around for well over 20, or more years that says ex-offenders have a low risk of recidivism, so there is nothing "new" about it.
A total of 114 offenders were released from involuntary commitment from 2009 through 2013, compared to 31 during the prior five-year period, according to a Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism analysis of data from Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, where the state houses committed sexually violent persons.
Most were discharged with electronic monitors and no further required treatment. But a growing number of these offenders were subject to "supervised release," meaning they receive intensive treatment and monitoring.
A bill signed into law by Gov. Scott Walker in December will increase the use of this kind of supervision for offenders who are released.
"The increased number of patients on supervised release in Wisconsin does not place communities at greater risk, as long as those patients have been treated and are well-managed," said Lloyd Sinclair, court assessment and community programs director for Sand Ridge.
Since Chapter 980, Wisconsin's sexually violent persons law, took effect in 1994, the state has committed about 500 individuals past the ends of their criminal sentences. About two-thirds of them remain confined.
To be locked up under Chapter 980, a person must have committed a sexually violent offense, have a mental disorder and be determined to be dangerous to others.
Wisconsin state psychologists calculate the risk that sex offenders will reoffend based on historical recidivism data. The state had been basing decisions on data from around 1980. Now that the models have been updated to reflect information on offenders released during the 1990s, including a decade of follow-up data, some Sand Ridge patients no longer meet the criteria for commitment, officials say.
The number of sexually violent persons on supervised release is expected to reach a monthly average of 43 in fiscal 2015, up from 21 in fiscal 2010, according to an August 2013 state audit report on the supervised release program.
"The increasing number of individuals on supervised release is explained, in part, by recent research that has determined that certain types of individuals are less likely to commit additional sexual offenses than had previously been thought," the audit said.
See Also:
Label:
CivilCommitment,
Treatment,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Mauston, WI, USA
Selasa, 28 Januari 2014
WI - 7th Circuit upholds $100 annual sex offender registry (extortion) fee

01/28/2014
By Bruce Vielmetti
The $100 that Wisconsin sex offenders must pay every year for being listed on a registry is not an unlawful fine, a federal appeals court has ruled. But the court did not address other lifetime conditions of Wisconsin sex offender registration because it found the challengers lacked standing.
The decision (PDF) by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a ruling by a Green Bay federal judge, and also thwarted the plaintiffs' request to proceed as unnamed. Instead, the court added their names to the case.
U.S. District Judge William Griesbach had ruled the $100 fee amounted to a fine and therefore was an unlawful "ex post facto" punishment for the two plaintiffs, who had been convicted before Wisconsin adopted the sex offender monitoring law.
_____ and _____ remain subject to not only the annual $100 fee, but also many other lifetime requirements and restrictions of the sex offender registry, even though they now live in Connecticut and Florida, respectively, and never intend to return to Wisconsin.
_____ was convicted in 1993 and served four years in prison plus six years of probation. _____ was convicted in 1985 and served five years, then again in 1993 and served one year. Each is now subject to lifetime registry in Wisconsin.
But if that's true, the court wrote, they would likely never face any real consequence of violating those restrictions, such as changing their name, or photographing children, or not reporting a change of address, because Wisconsin admits it has never tried to enforce completely out-of-state violations of the restrictions.
_____ and _____ do have standing to complain about the annual re-registration and fee, but the court said those aspects of the law are not punitive, and therefore not prohibited "ex post facto" law. Judge Richard Posner wrote the opinion for a panel that included Judge Diane Sykes and Judge Frank Easterbrook.
"The fee is intended to compensate the state for the expense of maintaining the sex offender registry," Posner wrote. "The offenders are responsible for the expense, so there is nothing 'punitive' about making them pay for it, any more than it is 'punitive' to charge a fee for a passport."
On the issue of the plaintiffs' request for anonymity, the court noted that while the plaintiffs contend they've been subjected to shunning and harassment for being on the offender registry, which is public, the court generally opposes secrecy. In this case, judges didn't see how any additional harm from being named as plaintiffs could outweigh the disruption to their personal lives they say they already have suffered.
Label:
Extortion,
lawSuit,
RegistrationFee,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Wisconsin, USA
Selasa, 05 November 2013
WI - Sex offender registry restrictions not working

11/04/2013
By Shana Rowan
The Sheboygan Press Nov. 2 article on Sheboygan’s sex offender ordinance did an excellent job of examining residency laws from various perspectives. As an advocate for evidence-based sex offender policies and fiance to a registrant whose crime was committed as a minor, I applaud the paper’s integrity.
As discussed in the article, years of research on residency restrictions have found no evidence that they reduce sexual recidivism or prevent new crimes. At best, Sheboygan's ordinance has done nothing to influence recidivism one way or another. At worst, however, it has been counter-productive to public safety. The ordinance does not target those who pose the most risk to commit child sexual abuse (95 percent of all child victims are abused by a family member, friend or acquaintance.)
It also doesn't target registrants who cannot find housing due to the ordinance, and have violated it by not reporting an accurate address, or have become homeless or transient. Law enforcement, departments of correction, treatment providers to both victims and offenders, and public policy researchers have all denounced residency laws as well-intentioned but detrimental to society.
Why do city council members believe they somehow know better? Research on sex offender laws is extremely accessible and the public must begin educating itself rather than relying on lawmakers to deliver the truth, since “it’s working” is clearly a subjective assessment.
Shana Rowan
Executive Director
Label:
Letters,
Opinion,
ShanaRowan,
USAFair,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Sheboygan, WI, USA
Jumat, 18 Oktober 2013
WI - 13-year-old sex offender
Video Description:
A state appeals court announced Tuesday, a 13-year-old Shawano County boy must register as a convicted sex offender. However, the public may never know who or where he is.
A state appeals court announced Tuesday, a 13-year-old Shawano County boy must register as a convicted sex offender. However, the public may never know who or where he is.
Kamis, 17 Oktober 2013
WI - Town leaves lights on near sex offenders' homes
Original Article
10/12/2013
By Peter J. Devlin
Despite an effort to remove streetlights that no longer serve their original purpose, the Brussels Town Board Wednesday voted to not remove two from poles in the Kolberg area where a convicted repeat sex offender resumed residency two weeks ago.
Two men, who would not give their names for this story, said they were very concerned about the presence of the registered sex offender in their community because of the number of children who live in close proximity.
The unnamed sex offender was released from prison last month after completing a sentence on a conviction of having sexual contact with a child under the age of 13, Town Clerk JoAnn Neinas said.
“Instead of taking streetlights out, we should light the place up,” said one man, who said he lives next door to the offender’s residence and has grandchildren who visit frequently.
The other anonymous speaker at the meeting said he lives directly across County D from the offender’s residence and has younger children.
Town Chairman Joe Wautier said that although the town adopted an ordinance in 2008 requiring convicted sex offenders to locate substantial distances from any place where children gather, the town can’t enforce the law in the current instance.
The ordinance would prohibit any offender from establishing residency within 2,500 feet of a park or other places where children gather, including places of worship. Emmanuals Lutheran Church is located near the offender’s residence.
But because the offender listed his current address with the State of Wisconsin in 1999, “he’s grandfathered in,” Wautier said. “We got the letter from the town’s attorney saying we can’t do anything as a town.”
The offender “told the parole officer he’s looking for a different place,” the town chairman said, “but when I drove through there, I see they’re fixing the place up.”
The two neighbors claimed the property was owned by a relative, disputing the offender had actually lived at the address before his recent release.
“No, not living there,” Neinas said. “Registered with the Department of Corrections. Registered as a sex offender.”
In addition to voting to leave the two streetlights in place in Kolberg, the board also voted to leave in place another light near another registered offender’s residence.
The board did vote to remove 11 other lights that are situated at locations where long-closed taverns and stores were once located.
Supervisor Joel Daoust estimated the town would save more than $2,600 each year while retaining 34 lights, each costing about $20 per month.
10/12/2013
By Peter J. Devlin
Despite an effort to remove streetlights that no longer serve their original purpose, the Brussels Town Board Wednesday voted to not remove two from poles in the Kolberg area where a convicted repeat sex offender resumed residency two weeks ago.
Two men, who would not give their names for this story, said they were very concerned about the presence of the registered sex offender in their community because of the number of children who live in close proximity.
The unnamed sex offender was released from prison last month after completing a sentence on a conviction of having sexual contact with a child under the age of 13, Town Clerk JoAnn Neinas said.
“Instead of taking streetlights out, we should light the place up,” said one man, who said he lives next door to the offender’s residence and has grandchildren who visit frequently.
The other anonymous speaker at the meeting said he lives directly across County D from the offender’s residence and has younger children.
Town Chairman Joe Wautier said that although the town adopted an ordinance in 2008 requiring convicted sex offenders to locate substantial distances from any place where children gather, the town can’t enforce the law in the current instance.
The ordinance would prohibit any offender from establishing residency within 2,500 feet of a park or other places where children gather, including places of worship. Emmanuals Lutheran Church is located near the offender’s residence.
But because the offender listed his current address with the State of Wisconsin in 1999, “he’s grandfathered in,” Wautier said. “We got the letter from the town’s attorney saying we can’t do anything as a town.”
The offender “told the parole officer he’s looking for a different place,” the town chairman said, “but when I drove through there, I see they’re fixing the place up.”
The two neighbors claimed the property was owned by a relative, disputing the offender had actually lived at the address before his recent release.
“No, not living there,” Neinas said. “Registered with the Department of Corrections. Registered as a sex offender.”
In addition to voting to leave the two streetlights in place in Kolberg, the board also voted to leave in place another light near another registered offender’s residence.
The board did vote to remove 11 other lights that are situated at locations where long-closed taverns and stores were once located.
Supervisor Joel Daoust estimated the town would save more than $2,600 each year while retaining 34 lights, each costing about $20 per month.
Label:
Church,
Park,
Residency,
StreetLights,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Kolberg, WI 54213, USA
Senin, 21 Januari 2013
WI - Where Should Sex Offenders Live When They're Released?
Original Article
Anywhere they want!
01/21/2013
By Heather Asiyanbi
After they've served their time, sex offenders by statute must be released into the communities where they committed their crimes. Understandably, this doesn't sit well with potential neighbors, but they have to go somewhere, right?
The almost-release of convicted sex offender [name withheld] into the Manree Park neighborhood touched a deep nerve throughout the community.
Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz temporarily rescinded his release order because one of [name withheld]'s victims lives just a block or two away from [name withheld]'s proposed residence at 918 Lathrop Avenue.
[name withheld] was convicted first in 1987 of second degree sexual assault and served an 18-month sentence. He was then convicted of attempted burglary and got a five-year stint in prison. Then, in 1994, he was convicted of attacking two 12-year-old girls. After he served his sentence, he was found to be sexually violent under Wisconsin's 980 law (PDF) and committed to the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston.
State statute says that sex offenders have to be released back into the communities where they committed their crimes so [name withheld] will live, albeit under strict supervision, somewhere in Racine County. The trick, according to Lloyd Sinclair of the Department of Human Services, is finding a location that isn't too close to schools, playgrounds, or daycare centers. DHS also has to be sure that victims aren't nearby and there aren't too many other sex offenders in the neighborhood as well.
It's a tall order to be sure, and residents who live in the vicinity get vocal about not having these types of criminals in their neighborhoods.
Terri Renguette on Facebook said, "I suggest right next door to the judge, his attorney, the parole board or anyone else from the court system that think this is a safe idea. Let him be their next door neighbor around their kids and grandkids."
Patch reader C. Sanders posted a comment on an earlier story, "If they want to release this (expletive), then air drop him nude to a remote location in Antarctica. For that matter, send him into space with enough air for 30 seconds."
- And the Patch is not moderating comments! They should've deleted this comment and forgot about it, not re-publish it.
[name withheld]'s release is still a go, and the DHS has 30 days or less to find a suitable location, per the judge's order issued Thursday.
So, readers, where should sex offenders be placed when it's time for them to be released? (See the poll at the original article)
Anywhere they want!
01/21/2013
By Heather Asiyanbi
After they've served their time, sex offenders by statute must be released into the communities where they committed their crimes. Understandably, this doesn't sit well with potential neighbors, but they have to go somewhere, right?
The almost-release of convicted sex offender [name withheld] into the Manree Park neighborhood touched a deep nerve throughout the community.
Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz temporarily rescinded his release order because one of [name withheld]'s victims lives just a block or two away from [name withheld]'s proposed residence at 918 Lathrop Avenue.
[name withheld] was convicted first in 1987 of second degree sexual assault and served an 18-month sentence. He was then convicted of attempted burglary and got a five-year stint in prison. Then, in 1994, he was convicted of attacking two 12-year-old girls. After he served his sentence, he was found to be sexually violent under Wisconsin's 980 law (PDF) and committed to the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston.
State statute says that sex offenders have to be released back into the communities where they committed their crimes so [name withheld] will live, albeit under strict supervision, somewhere in Racine County. The trick, according to Lloyd Sinclair of the Department of Human Services, is finding a location that isn't too close to schools, playgrounds, or daycare centers. DHS also has to be sure that victims aren't nearby and there aren't too many other sex offenders in the neighborhood as well.
It's a tall order to be sure, and residents who live in the vicinity get vocal about not having these types of criminals in their neighborhoods.
Terri Renguette on Facebook said, "I suggest right next door to the judge, his attorney, the parole board or anyone else from the court system that think this is a safe idea. Let him be their next door neighbor around their kids and grandkids."
Patch reader C. Sanders posted a comment on an earlier story, "If they want to release this (expletive), then air drop him nude to a remote location in Antarctica. For that matter, send him into space with enough air for 30 seconds."
- And the Patch is not moderating comments! They should've deleted this comment and forgot about it, not re-publish it.
[name withheld]'s release is still a go, and the DHS has 30 days or less to find a suitable location, per the judge's order issued Thursday.
So, readers, where should sex offenders be placed when it's time for them to be released? (See the poll at the original article)
Label:
Housing,
Playground,
Residency,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Racine, WI, USA
Sabtu, 22 September 2012
WI - Parents Sue D.A. for Charging Their 6-Year-Old Son With a Felony After He Played Doctor With a 5-Year-Old Girl
Original Article
11/23/2011
By Jacob Sullum
Last week the parents of a Wisconsin boy sued Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker for charging their son with first-degree sexual assault, a Class B felony, after he played "butt doctor" with a 5-year-old girl. He was 6 at the time. When the boy's lawyer tried to have the charge dismissed, Riniker replied: "The legislature could have put an age restriction in the statute if it wanted to. The legislature did no such thing."
According to the complaint (PDF), the girl is "the daughter of a well-known political figure in Grant County," and her brother, who is the same age, also was involved in playing doctor but was not charged. In addition to Riniker, the lawsuit names as defendants retired Grant County Sheriff's Sgt. James Kopp and Jan Moravits, an investigator with Grant County Social Services "whose regional supervisor...is the political figure's wife's sister-in-law"—i.e., the aunt of the alleged victim.
Although the boy, now 7, is too young to be prosecuted or named in a juvenile delinquency petition, Madison.com reports, county officials are using the felony charge to force his parents into accepting "protection or services" for him. The lawsuit says that once he turns 18, he will be listed as a sex offender.
I noted a similar case in my July Reason story on sex offender laws.
11/23/2011
By Jacob Sullum
Last week the parents of a Wisconsin boy sued Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker for charging their son with first-degree sexual assault, a Class B felony, after he played "butt doctor" with a 5-year-old girl. He was 6 at the time. When the boy's lawyer tried to have the charge dismissed, Riniker replied: "The legislature could have put an age restriction in the statute if it wanted to. The legislature did no such thing."
According to the complaint (PDF), the girl is "the daughter of a well-known political figure in Grant County," and her brother, who is the same age, also was involved in playing doctor but was not charged. In addition to Riniker, the lawsuit names as defendants retired Grant County Sheriff's Sgt. James Kopp and Jan Moravits, an investigator with Grant County Social Services "whose regional supervisor...is the political figure's wife's sister-in-law"—i.e., the aunt of the alleged victim.
Although the boy, now 7, is too young to be prosecuted or named in a juvenile delinquency petition, Madison.com reports, county officials are using the felony charge to force his parents into accepting "protection or services" for him. The lawsuit says that once he turns 18, he will be listed as a sex offender.
I noted a similar case in my July Reason story on sex offender laws.
Jumat, 21 September 2012
WI - Lawmakers consider changes to sex predator law
Original Article
09/21/2012
By Gilman Halsted
A legislative council committee is considering changes to the state's sex predator law. The committee heard testimony from prosecutors and defense attorneys at a hearing in Madison Wednesday.
The committee is trying to tweak the law, while still protecting both public safety and the rights of an offender to be released someday. Milwaukee County prosecutor Holly Bunch told the committee there is a problem with the new risk assessment tool used. She says it is making it much easier for people who have been committed as predators under Chapter 980 to be released without supervision, even if they refuse to accept treatment while they are confined. "This has been most disturbing to me in cases where a person has been a treatment refuser, has sat there doing nothing, when the whole point of Chapter 980 is treatment, and then somehow gets rewarded for a change in the science. My perspective is that leopards just don't generally change their spots."
A defense attorney who represents people committed under the sex predator law disagrees. Vincent Rust works in the La Crosse public defender’s office. He said, "What she's [Bunch’s] saying is that the risk continues over a life span. Well, I think in a way it's just common sense. I don't think that we need to test it. If a guy commits a rape when he's 25, he's going to be less risky when he's 60, and that's what the empirical studies show."
Rust agrees with prosecutors that the law is not treating people fairly now. He says there needs to be more of an incentive for offenders to accept treatment both in the institution and in the community once they are released. The committee plans to propose changes to the law next year.
09/21/2012
By Gilman Halsted
A legislative council committee is considering changes to the state's sex predator law. The committee heard testimony from prosecutors and defense attorneys at a hearing in Madison Wednesday.
The committee is trying to tweak the law, while still protecting both public safety and the rights of an offender to be released someday. Milwaukee County prosecutor Holly Bunch told the committee there is a problem with the new risk assessment tool used. She says it is making it much easier for people who have been committed as predators under Chapter 980 to be released without supervision, even if they refuse to accept treatment while they are confined. "This has been most disturbing to me in cases where a person has been a treatment refuser, has sat there doing nothing, when the whole point of Chapter 980 is treatment, and then somehow gets rewarded for a change in the science. My perspective is that leopards just don't generally change their spots."
A defense attorney who represents people committed under the sex predator law disagrees. Vincent Rust works in the La Crosse public defender’s office. He said, "What she's [Bunch’s] saying is that the risk continues over a life span. Well, I think in a way it's just common sense. I don't think that we need to test it. If a guy commits a rape when he's 25, he's going to be less risky when he's 60, and that's what the empirical studies show."
Rust agrees with prosecutors that the law is not treating people fairly now. He says there needs to be more of an incentive for offenders to accept treatment both in the institution and in the community once they are released. The committee plans to propose changes to the law next year.
Label:
CivilCommitment,
Treatment,
Wisconsin
Lokasi:
Milwaukee, WI, USA
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)