New Life Style

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Treatment. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Treatment. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 07 Oktober 2014

CANADA - Sex offender supports on a shoestring

Susan Love & Adina Ilea
Susan Love & Adina Ilea
Original Article

09/25/2014

By Erin McCracken

The day the doors to David’s prison cell slid open and he was free after spending five and a half years behind bars for sex crimes against children, he was given a one-way ticket to Ottawa and placed on a bus.

Armed only with expired identification, a little cash earned inside prison and two boxes and a bag containing his few possessions, David arrived in the city with limited prospects.

The challenges he faced reintegrating in society were enormous. There would be hurdles in finding a job and stable housing, securing money and proper identification and abiding by strict supervision rules that kicked in upon his release.

It had been almost six years,” said David, speaking under a pseudonym to protect his identity. “It was overwhelming. Scary, because you’re coming out into society and it’s open, it’s freedom.”

So it was difficult at first, but eventually you blend into it.”

The key to blending in, in part, proved to be two smiling women who met him at the bus stop as planned, – his first introduction to a surrogate network of friends and family who wanted to help him rebuild his life, and in the process, ensure he would not reoffend.

They are among more than 50 volunteers with Circles of Support and Accountability-Ottawa, one of 20 CoSA programs across Canada through which 500 volunteers are helping nearly 200 high-risk, high-needs sex offenders reintegrate in society after prison.

At first I didn’t know what to do. I have no social life,” said David. “There was a bit of boredom, a bit of loneliness, but I was able to talk to CoSA about it.”

Each week, he met with his group of four volunteers to talk about his issues, and spent one-on-one time with each of them by going out for coffee, or watching a movie.

They provided him with friendship and support, referring him to services in the city that could help him.

Positive social supports, experts say, combined with sexual-behaviour counselling and treatment, are key to ensuring former offenders such as David do not fall back into their old patterns, leading to more victims.

After almost a year with CoSA, David seemed to be doing well. He had stable housing at a halfway house for ex-inmates and was taking part in a counselling program there. He had found work.

Kamis, 19 Juni 2014

NE - No money for local sex offender program after June 30

Money
Original Article

Ex-sex offenders already have the lowest recidivism rate of any other ex-felon (see here), but you don't see treatment like this for murderers, gang members, DUI offenders, thieves, etc, who re-offend more often, why? Because ex-sex offenders are easy prey!

06/18/2014

By NANCY HICKS

A Lincoln-based outpatient treatment program that helps keep sex offenders from re-offending may end this summer, because there appears to be no money to keep it running.

By all accounts, the STOP program run by Lincoln psychologist Dr. Mary Paine since 2000 has been successful in reducing the recidivism of people with sexually deviant behavior who are living in the Lincoln area.

We can’t just have it shut down,” Deputy Lancaster County Public Defender Joe Nigro said, pointing to financial and public safety factors.

The program is a mix of group and individual therapy, based on the need of each client, that helps people adapt after being in prison or at the Lincoln Regional Center, and helps them avoid deviant behavior.

But there will be no funding for about half of the 50-plus clients after June 30 unless something changes.

Without the local program, some clients will have to go back to the Regional Center, or back to prison because they have been ordered by the mental health board to participate in the program.
- How can you send someone back to prison because the program they were forced to take is being shut down?  That isn't their fault!

And the average costs for the Regional Center program ($109,000 a year) and prison ($40,000 a year) are much higher than the $6,000 to $8,000 cost for the Lincoln outpatient program.

In addition, some clients who will remain in the community without any support are more likely to re-offend.

"(The program) has enormous value for all of us," Nigro said. "I live here, too. We all benefit if we reduce the risk to re-offend.”
- So since the ignorant politicians and public are the ones who wanted these useless laws, then why not tax them to help pay for it?

The two most likely funding sources for the estimated $200,000 cost are the Lancaster County Board and Region V Systems.

Region V Systems, which funds behavioral health services in 16 southeast Nebraska counties with state, local and federal funds, says it has no money for the program.

And Lancaster County commissioners say they shouldn’t be paying for the program, because they already pay $928,000 a year to Region V Systems for local services, far more per county resident than other counties in the southeast region.

The state pays for about half the clients in the program, the 25 patients who have come from the inpatient program at the Regional Center.
- The state (i.e. Tax payers), should be paying for 100% of the people forced into these treatment facilities!

Funding for the rest has been a mix from Region V and Lancaster County, according to Dean Settle, retired Community Mental Health Center director.

The STOP program was historically part of the Community Mental Health Center. But when the county privatized the center and its programs were turned over to Lutheran Family Services, the sex offender treatment program was not included, according to all the people involved in the funding discussion.

C.J. Johnson, administrator for Region V, suggested that some of the needed money might come from state sources, perhaps probation, whose clients are part of the STOP program.

Perhaps the Lincoln Regional Center, which has a sex offender line item in its budget, could help with the costs, he said.

"I don't know the answer," said Johnson.

He said he has been very clear over the past three years, during the transition from county-run mental health center to privately run center, that the new provider would not handle the STOP program and that there was no money for it.

I don’t know why the issue wasn’t dealt with as part of the process when the county closed down the mental health center," said Nigro.

In the past, Settle said, the County Board had made the program a priority because so many sex offenders end up living in Lancaster County after their release from prison or the Regional Center.

In order to protect the public from people who might re-offend, the board wanted to make sure these people had services, that someone was checking on them and making sure they had someone to talk to, Settle said.
- If you really wanted to "protect" the public from people who might re-offend, then where is the program for murderers, gang members, drug dealers, DUI offenders, etc, who re-offend and a far greater rate?

"They saw it as a public-safety issue."

Minggu, 02 Februari 2014

WI - Wisconsin freeing more sex offenders from mental lockup

Civil commitment (aka Prison)Original Article

02/02/2014

By Nora G. Hertel

Wisconsin officials have nearly quadrupled the number of offenders released from state custody after they were committed as sexually violent persons.

The risks to residents are reasonable, officials say, because the state's treatment programs are working and new data suggest these offenders are less likely to reoffend than previously thought.
- New data?  Studies have been around for well over 20, or more years that says ex-offenders have a low risk of recidivism, so there is nothing "new" about it.

A total of 114 offenders were released from involuntary commitment from 2009 through 2013, compared to 31 during the prior five-year period, according to a Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism analysis of data from Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, where the state houses committed sexually violent persons.

Most were discharged with electronic monitors and no further required treatment. But a growing number of these offenders were subject to "supervised release," meaning they receive intensive treatment and monitoring.

A bill signed into law by Gov. Scott Walker in December will increase the use of this kind of supervision for offenders who are released.

"The increased number of patients on supervised release in Wisconsin does not place communities at greater risk, as long as those patients have been treated and are well-managed," said Lloyd Sinclair, court assessment and community programs director for Sand Ridge.

Since Chapter 980, Wisconsin's sexually violent persons law, took effect in 1994, the state has committed about 500 individuals past the ends of their criminal sentences. About two-thirds of them remain confined.

To be locked up under Chapter 980, a person must have committed a sexually violent offense, have a mental disorder and be determined to be dangerous to others.

Wisconsin state psychologists calculate the risk that sex offenders will reoffend based on historical recidivism data. The state had been basing decisions on data from around 1980. Now that the models have been updated to reflect information on offenders released during the 1990s, including a decade of follow-up data, some Sand Ridge patients no longer meet the criteria for commitment, officials say.

The number of sexually violent persons on supervised release is expected to reach a monthly average of 43 in fiscal 2015, up from 21 in fiscal 2010, according to an August 2013 state audit report on the supervised release program.

"The increasing number of individuals on supervised release is explained, in part, by recent research that has determined that certain types of individuals are less likely to commit additional sexual offenses than had previously been thought," the audit said.

See Also:

Selasa, 28 Januari 2014

CO - Audit criticizes Colorado's program for monitoring sex offenders

Sex offender therapistOriginal Article

01/28/2014

By David Olinger

Colorado is overtreating many low-risk sex offenders in the mistaken belief that they cannot be cured, an independent consultant has found.

As a result, the state's Sex Offender Management Board is wasting significant amounts of public money on supervision in the community, according to a report from Central Coast Clinical and Forensic Psychology Services.

The report, released earlier this month, also concluded that Colorado's system for classifying some offenders as sexually violent predators is hopelessly flawed and in urgent need of replacement. That means Colorado could be classifying the wrong people as sexually violent predators.

The findings were met with approval from advocates of reform for sex-offender treatment but with skepticism from a victims' group.

The report's recommendations, if adopted, could dramatically change the supervision of sex offenders, many of whom are now monitored for life.

There were 1,412 sex offenders under intensive supervision on probation in the state as of June 30, and 767 of those were under lifetime supervision, according to the Colorado Department of Corrections.

The consultant's analysis of the board, an arm of the state Department of Public Safety, commended Colorado for developing a model treatment program in the 1990s and for the thought and dedication put into its guidelines for managing sex offenders.

At the same time, it reported that Colorado has adhered stubbornly to the idea that sex offenders cannot be cured and must be managed for life despite abundant research to the contrary.

The board's guidelines "communicate a view of sex offenders' risk," the report said, that they have "a disorder which cannot be cured," that all sex offenders pose a "dangerously high risk," and that "the danger can only be managed by constant vigilance." As a result, "expending special and expensive resources on managing low-risk offenders wastes public money," the report said.

Its criticisms echo a scathing report from the same consultant last year that sex-offender programs in Colorado prisons have created a treatment backlog that leaves some inmates waiting for years for therapy.

"I thought it was fantastic. We're thrilled," said Susan Walker, director of the Coalition for Sexual Offense Restoration.

"Finally, somebody besides us is saying that under the no-cure philosophy, the (sex-offender management board) has not been functioning under appropriate standards and guidelines."

Erin Jemison, executive director of the Colorado Coalition Against Sex Assault, participated in the consultant's round of focus groups and found it unbalanced.

"While there were some good suggestions that the board needs to look at," Jemison said, "I think they did not include victim and victim- advocate voices to the same extent that they included offender voices. I think that's reflected in the report."

The report cited multiple problems with the risk scale that Colorado uses to identify sexually violent predators and concluded the state has "no credible data" to justify its use.

"There is an urgent need," the report said, to replace its method for calling someone a predator "with an instrument that is soundly developed."

The report also criticized treatment programs for relying too much on polygraph examinations as a means of measuring an offender's success.

Chris Lobanov-Rostovsky, the program manager for the board, said it has been working already on some of the changes recommended in the report.

See Also:

Sabtu, 25 Januari 2014

APA Opposes Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders After Prison

Psychiatric News
Original Article

This article has no date on it, but based on the URL it would appear this is from 08/21/1998.

APA's Board of Trustees approved a task force report on sexually dangerous offenders at its meeting last month in San Diego recommending that psychiatrists vigorously oppose sexual predator laws.

Opposing such laws is necessary "to preserve the moral authority of the profession and ensure continuing societal confidence in the medical model of civil commitment," states the report.

The report was written by the Task Force on Sexually Dangerous Offenders, a component of APA's Council on Psychiatry and Law, which endorsed the report before it went to the Board for action.

Paul Appelbaum, M.D., was chair of the council when the five-member task force was formed five years ago. Its creation, he noted, was in response to several states' adopting sexual predator laws allowing sex offenders postincarceration to be civilly committed to psychiatric facilities.

"We were concerned that psychiatry was being used to preventively detain a class of people for whom confinement rather than treatment was the real goal. This struck many people as a misuse of psychiatry."

The task force agreed, stating in its report that the diagnosis of sexual predator is based on "a vague and circular determination that an offender has a 'mental abnormality' that has led to repeat criminal behavior. Thus, these statutes have the effect of defining mental illness in terms of criminal behavior. This is a misuse of psychiatry, because legislators have used psychiatric commitment to effect nonmedical societal ends."

The task force recommends that societal concerns about protection from dangerous sex offenders be met instead through customary sentencing alternatives within the criminal justice system.

Appelbaum observed that since the U.S. Supreme Court decision last year in the case Kansas v. Hendricks upholding the constitutionality of the Kansas sexual predator law, several states have introduced or passed similar laws.

The purpose of the task force was to assemble information necessary to inform decision making by psychiatrists, legislators, and judges regarding the clinical and ethical implications of sexual predator statutes. The report synthesizes available literature on the diagnoses, treatment, and recidivism of sex offenders, and sexual predator commitment laws including relevant court cases. There is also a section on juvenile sex offenders, frequently asked questions, and a summary of conclusions and policy recommendations.

Appelbaum commented, "The task force report serves as a resource for psychiatrists who want to learn more about sexual disorders and developing treatments and underscores the need for training in psychiatric research programs."

The report notes that except for a few dedicated researchers and clinicians, most psychiatrists are unfamiliar with the assessment and treatment of sex offenders.

The task force report also presents key findings and recommendations in the following areas:

Diagnosis and Treatment
  • A significant number of people have paraphilias but only a small percentage receive treatment in either correctional institutions or community settings.
  • The treatment approach that is most likely to have an effect on recidivism is multimodal, that is, combining pharmacological, cognitive, and behavioral treatments and relapse prevention.
  • There should be an increased investment in research on paraphilic disorders and in the clinical training of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals regarding assessment and treatment of persons with those disorders.

Treatment Within the Criminal Justice System
  • Legislatures and correctional agencies should provide therapeutic opportunities for dangerous sex offenders to reduce the rate of recidivism and establish funded programs based on current clinical knowledge.
  • Sex offenders should be able to participate in treatment programs while serving criminal sentences regardless of whether such participation has any bearing on the nature and length of their sentences. Participation should not be mandatory.
  • Legislatures interested in developing incentives to encourage sex offenders with paraphilic disorders to participate in treatment should consider special indeterminate sentencing arrangements. Participation should be voluntary and limited to offenders who are clinically suitable.

Chemical Castration Laws
  • These laws, which predicate release from prison on chemical castration by surgery or antiandrogenic agents for broad classes of sex offenders, are objectionable because they are not based on adequate diagnostic and treatment considerations. They also improperly link medical treatment with punishment and social control.

The Task Force Report on Sexually Dangerous Offenders was written by task force members Howard Zonana, M.D. (chair), Gene Abel, M.D., John Bradford, M.D., Steven K. Hoge, M.D., and Jeffrey Metzer, M.D. Serving as consultants were Judith Becker, Ph.D., Richard Bonnie, LL.B., and Lawrence Fitch, J.D. The report will be published by the American Psychiatric Press Inc. for release next spring.

Selasa, 05 November 2013

CO - Denver Post article, shows eight amendment violation, for lack of treatment

Morning coffee and newspaper
Original Article

11/05/2013

By Will Bassler

An article in the Denver Post on November 3, 2013 was titled “Unintended effect of 1998 Colorado law: More sex offenders in for life”. This article brought to light that Colorado has not been offering treatment, as is required by law to people who have been sentenced for crimes. These people can only be released after receiving effective treatment and the state is not offering that treatment supposedly because of facilities and financial issues.

I responded back to the writer of the article, in hopes that he would do a follow-up article showing that the state of Colorado is not only acting irresponsibly but they are also opening themselves up to multimillion dollar lawsuits based on prior federal court decisions.

In reading your recent story in the Denver Post “Unintended effect of 1998 Colorado law” I thought about posting a response in the comments section , but realized my response would be way too long, especially considering I would be using direct quotes from a federal case stating that the state of Colorado cannot use the excuse of the necessity of funds, facilities or staff to justify lack of treatment. Also, the fact that in the same case the federal court has stated that just because someone commits a crime you cannot declare them mentally ill and require them to be in treatment.

The second part of this is the fact that there is a constitutional issue here that most people don’t want to deal with. Because of the Constitution and Bill of Rights of this country you’re allowed to dislike, even outright hate, a person or group that is all well and good. You have that right under the Constitution, what you do not have is the right force your ideas or Moral values, on other individuals. Just because of your dislike or fear of a group of people this does not give you the right to take away their constitutional protections. As soon as you start doing that you are destroying the very fabric that this country was built on and you become as un-American as somebody in another country burning an American flag or flying a plane into the World Trade Center. Think about it, if you want to retain your constitutional rights you have to fight to make sure that everyone keeps theirs, even the people that you dislike or hate.

Consider this information from federal cases.

Jumat, 01 November 2013

VT - Sex offender investigation: Treatment programs

TherapistOriginal Article (Video Available)

11/01/2013

By Bridget Shanahan

Studies have shown the therapy can help lower recidivism rates but not everyone gets help.

COLCHESTER - It’s a rare glimpse into a treatment program for sex offenders.

Studies have shown the therapy can help lower recidivism rates but not everyone gets help.
- Ex-sex offenders already have the lowest recidivism rate, for a new sexual crime, than any other ex-felon.

Sex offender treatment is only an option for Vermont inmates, and those who enroll end up being less than a quarter of the population.

But for those who choose, there is help. There are meetings and groups all over the state where convicted sex offenders can find support.

It was like losing my child cause we were so close living together, you know,” Lucinda Milne said.

Not a day goes by for Milne without remembering her granddaughter, Brooke Bennett.

Terrible. It's like a nightmare. A terrible, terrible nightmare that I haven't woke up to yet,” Milne said.

Milne's son-in-law is awaiting his final sentencing after being convicted of kidnapping, raping and killing his 12-year-old niece, Brooke, five years ago.

I just couldn't believe that he did those things. You know? Tore my family apart,” Milne said.

_____ was a convicted sex offender when he killed Brooke, and like many others in Vermont he'd been through treatment, both while he was in prison and when he was released on probation.

When we asked Milne if she thought treatment could help someone like _____  she said, “I'm not sure. I'm not sure.

According to a Vermont Department of Corrections study, those who go through treatment are less likely to reoffend. But convicted sex offenders cannot be forced into a program while they're incarcerated. Prison officials say that's because the program works best when offenders are committed to it similar to AA or drug rehab programs.

If I’m in a situation where I may be tempted, I have the skills to think my way through it and get out of it. That's what we can offer in a treatment program,” Corrections commissioner Andy Pallito said.

That study is now more than 10 years old.

And according to more current information obtained by Newschannel Five, the number of sex offenders in Vermont prisons was between 450 and 550 each year from 2008 to 2012 but because of limited space only 78 of those can be in treatment at any given time. In an email to WPTZ the DOC noted there has not been a waitlist for quote "quite some time."

And because Vermont has no civil confinement law, which can keep high risk offenders in prison past their sentence, those without treatment are simply released when their sentence is up.

Some people, I think, tend to judge people when they hear the word or when they find out you've come out of prison they tend to judge you on what you did and that's who they think you are.”

Two years after his release, this convicted sex offender still worries about the repercussions of identifying himself as a sex offender. He asked us to conceal his identity.

He went through treatment in prison and says he's continuing to make progress now that he's on the outside.

It's accepting responsibility for what you've done, what you're capable of, that you did what you did, acknowledging it and not making any excuses.”

He attends a weekly faith-based meeting in Burlington for ex-cons. It's hosted by Pastor Pete Fiske from the Church at Prison.

Nobody is born wanting to be a sex offender. It happens in their lives. They get messed up. And it's despicable and they know it,” Fiske said.

Fiske helps provide support to those he says society often rejects.

If you have that you have to learn how to manage that, like in AA alcoholics learn how to manage their addictions,” Fiske said.

Still, some will never find faith in treatment. There's simply too much to overcome.

I don't want somebody to buy the house that right over there and move in that's a sex offender. I don't care if he's married, got kids or not. I don't want him in my neighborhood. It would bring back too much. Too much,” Milne said.

Sabtu, 19 Oktober 2013

CANADA - Calling a sex offender 'friend' Circles of Support & Accountability helps reintegrate and reduce risks

Otto and Florence Driedger volunteer with one of 25 Circles of Support and Accountability in Regina and area to provide positive support to recently released sex offenders.
Otto and Florence Driedger
Original Article

10/19/2013

By BARB PACHOLIK

Friends, family, a job, a place to live, they're the trappings of a life most people take for granted - unless you're a released high-risk sex offender.

They are the pariahs of the Canadian criminal justice system, both inside and outside prison walls.

The recent panic and school lockdowns surrounding high risk Alberta sex offender _____, who went on the lam after cutting off his monitoring ankle bracelet, is a tangible example of the anxiety they instil.

But few will be locked away forever. The correctional system is built on the notion of rehabilitation - go to prison, get some help and you ideally come out a reformed criminal, ready to re-join a society you have been away from for years, sometimes decades.

But society is waiting with closed doors not open arms because you're a sex offender, seemingly reformed or not.

If you're alienated and unable to weave your way back into the fabric of society, the risk of falling back into old habits, under the old pressures, of ultimately reoffending goes up. But few people want to risk opening the door - to a job, to an apartment, even to a shopping mall at times - because you might reoffend.

Tom is living that catch-22.

He looks so altogether ordinary - a kindly middle-aged face, groomed, simply dressed. He speaks well, likes a good game of bridge and has a gentle wit.

The picture contrasts sharply with an image of the younger version of this man, captured in reports and old news clippings - angry, addicted, out of control, and seemingly without conscience as his terrifying, violent crimes left a string of damaged victims.

Never finishing one sentence before adding a new one, he has now served more than three decades - most of his adult life - behind bars. His victims - none of whom were children - would likely say it still isn't enough; the law has deemed otherwise.

He's now trying to create a life in Regina, "outside the wall," as he calls it.

When first released, his reputation preceded him after he became the subject of a public disclosure warning in Regina. Another smaller community was up in arms when word got out that he was considering a move there.

He doesn't begrudge the police for putting out a warning, which also urges the public against vigilantism.

"They're letting the public know there's a person like myself in their community," says Tom, who agreed to speak to the Leader-Post on the condition he not be identified. He is real; the name "Tom" isn't.

"I'm not out here to hurt anybody. What I done was very horrible," he readily admits.

With plans announced recently by the Stephen Harper government to create a publicly accessible national sex offender registry, even more people like Tom will be under a microscope.

"There are steps I've taken now to ensure things like that will never happen again," he says.

His key to finding his way - and hopefully success - is a group of community volunteers who aren't afraid to call a sex offender "friend."

"I've been out twice before. I always reoffended and went back in. This is the longest period of time I've been out. And that's because of COSA."

Circles of Support and Accountability or COSA began informally in Regina in the 1990s to assist people like Tom. It's essentially a circle of friends with volunteers from all walks of life who meet regularly with an offender, try to show him a "positive path," challenge him when he veers from it, and hopefully reduce his risk. In COSA, Tom is known as a "core member" not an offender.

"The one thing I don't think people understand is it takes a community to help a person reintegrate," says Amanda Richter Goddard, co-ordinator for COSA's South Saskatchewan branch, based in Regina. "Our mandate here is we don't want anymore victims ... And providing that accountability and supportive relationship to these guys has shown to be the way to help them reintegrate safely."

What began informally with one offender who remains involved in COSA to this day - "he's never reoffended," Richter Goddard quickly adds - became an official organization in 2002.

In that time, COSA in the province's south has worked with 25 core members. In more recent years, COSA groups have also formed in Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

"Right now we have a 95-per-cent success rate," Richter Goddard says of the 25 circles in Regina and area. That means 24 have never reoffended sexually or otherwise, excluding breaches of court-ordered conditions, such as breaking curfew or drinking.

One federal study found "most sexual offenders do not re-offend sexually over time." After 20 years, 73 per cent of sexual offenders had not been charged with, or convicted of, another sexual offence, the report notes.

"It's really hard to sit down and statistically show community members that people who have offended sexually have the lowest recidivism rates," says Richter Goddard. "It doesn't matter to people."

Otto Driedger has been with COSA since the beginning, was a consultant when it began nationally, and is currently a volunteer in Tom's circle, one of 15 active circles in southern Saskatchewan. A retired University of Regina human justice professor, Driedger recalls all too clearly the high price of helping a paroled sex offender.

"He was stoned," interjects Driedger's wife Florence, who is also in Tom's circle. She means that quite literally.

When a core member, whose offences involved children, was forced by residents to move from a neighbourhood, Driedger returned the next day to collect the man's belongings. A resident hurled stones at the professor.

"That was the most intensive kind of a thing we've had. And that was in the beginning. There's been a lot of public education since then," says Driedger. Still, they speak of one core member who isn't allowed in a Regina shopping mall - not because of anything he's done but because of the trouble his presence might stir up.

The Driedgers and Richter Goddard talk of the "barriers" offenders face in trying to move from long-term prisoner to lawabiding citizen.

Many of the fellows - all the core members are men - have trouble finding work. Florence recalls one who was on the job for three days with a major Regina company - until his record check came back and head office directed the employer to cut him loose.

"When you have those kinds of situations, it really deflates a person. You don't have the self esteem," she says.

Tom has been fortunate to find work. His employer knows he was in prison and for how long - but not necessarily for what crimes. "She just says, 'At least you're here everyday.' " It's a minimum wage position, and he'll need to do better if he's to afford his own apartment some day. He has put out a lot of applications. "It's very hard to find jobs - especially if you're a sex offender," says Tom.

Driedger has, on occasion, met the criticism head on, meeting with community members to explain COSA's approach.

"If you have a person in your community who has offended sexually - if you are hostile toward, alienate him even more, then there's a much higher risk of him reoffending than if you relate to the person in a positive kind of way. And take precautions," he says.

"Now, nobody can assure that it's not going to happen, but you can minimize the possibility by not having alienation," he adds.

Florence recalls a core member who once confessed, "I don't know what's normal." So institutionalized, the man thought the woman who served his morning java at a local coffee shop must be coming on to him with her smiles and pleasantries. The circle enlightened him on common courtesy.

COSA tries to have both men and women in a circle. "Persons who have offended sexually - some of them have a feeling that women are sex objects," says Driedger, adding the circle helps them relate to women as people.

And for offenders who have suffered sexual abuse in their past at the hands of a man, being able to build a positive relationship with a male is also crucial.

When he arrived at a Regina halfway house a few years ago, Tom joined COSA on the recommendation of his parole officer and a fellow parolee.

"I came to Regina and I only knew three people, so getting involved with COSA was really helpful for me. It introduced me to a whole new range of other people."

Like an arranged marriage, the initial meeting was nerve-racking. "But I figured that, after listening for a while, that it was in my best interests to be open and honest right away," he adds.

From the tentative first steps grew a friendship that saw Tom and another core member host a barbecue at the Driedgers' Regina home. "Where else would you have people from COSA, parole and police all mingle in the same setting," says Tom, adding that he and the other member wanted to say thanks.

The program has won the support of Regina police.

"In talking with our own people - people who understand and appreciate the role of COSA members and volunteers - they give people a lot of credit for their patience and their generosity and their willingness to work with people that most of society would shun," says police spokesperson Elizabeth Popowich.

In addition to being a positive role model, volunteers can help with routine things many take for granted - getting a bus card, shopping for groceries, going to a bank, making a doctor's appointment, or - as Tom quips at one point - sort out why a so-called "zero-dollar" cellphone still costs money. "If someone has been removed from society and incarcerated, all these little things can become stressors," Popowich says. "And it might become an opportunity for failure."

Popowich likens COSA's role to watching a pot of liquid on the stove.

"Nobody can predict when the liquid inside will reach its boiling point. And if we wait until we see the bubbles rising, it might be too late. But COSA - it's like they're in there and they're testing the water and identifying hot spots and trying to take measures to even things out again. And the testing comes through all of those interactions, the time spent with the core members."

Asked about his successful reintegration this time, Tom says another key difference was his decision not to return home. It helped him avoid falling back into old patterns of drug and alcohol use. He also meets weekly with a psychologist to tackle his own abuse issues from his past.

And for friendship and support, Tom meets regularly with his circle. Sometimes, they do little more than play bridge and swap stories. But it's a normalcy Tom never expected to find on the outside.

"It's not so much people I can turn to. It's people I can trust, because the trust issue is a big thing," says Tom. "They're one basic concern is my welfare - to make sure that I don't reoffend, to make sure I'm still on the right track."

Offenders join COSA voluntarily; it's not mandated by any parole or court order. In fact, Driedger says he would refuse a circle to an offender who was using it strictly to manipulate the system.

But even some who come willingly don't stay.

"Some (circles) have voluntarily closed due to the fact that they don't want to be involved. Maybe they aren't ready for it. Maybe they're not ready to be accountable," says Richter Goddard.

Upon joining a circle, the core member and volunteers sign a "covenant." Typically, the offender agrees to be honest, and abide by parole or court conditions, such as staying away from alcohol or drugs; the circle volunteers agree to respect the person and be available to him. "It's kind of a written agreement on how a friendship is," says Richter Goddard.

Before a core member signs on, he has to sit with the circle and give a brief history of his offences and his life. "It keeps you honest and helps be honest with others," says Tom.

If a core member heads in a direction that could lead to trouble, the circle volunteers will call him on it.

"In jail we say, you cannot con a con," says Tom.

"Well it's the same thing here when you start working with your core members. After a while, you get to know them, and they get to know you so well that they can tell when there's something that's not right."

Richter Goddard says if the behaviour was troublesome enough, the circle may consult with parole officials or police.

"They agreed that they could have friends that would call them out on their bad behaviours," she says.

Driedger is quick to add that volunteers walk "a fine line."

The circle is based on friendship, not surveillance.

But, he adds, "We all have circles of support and accountability. I always say, if I'm going to do something stupid, my wife is the first one that will tell me."

Richter Goddard recalls one core member who was challenged by his circle when they feared he might hurt himself or others. "They've had to get the police involved to make sure he hasn't hurt himself. And he still comes back because he knows that somebody cares for him - and I think that's something that he's never had."

Asked if the community is safer because of COSA, Driedger replies, "We cannot give assurances." Adds Florence, "We can't assure that of our next door neighbour."

But they point to a study that suggests high risk sex offenders who were involved with COSA were 83 per cent less likely to reoffend than those without a circle.

Tom says he's only one offender but is proof COSA is working for him. "This is the longest I've been out."

For the first time, he's actually finished a sentence on the outside. He recently moved out of a halfway house and into a private residence he shares with friends.

"It's how badly you want to stay out. I like it a lot better out here than I do inside. The people out here are a lot friendlier than the ones inside the wall."

Selasa, 08 Oktober 2013

Federal and State Laws Aim to Keep Tabs on Sex Offenders

News paper and coffee
Original Article

10/07/2013

By JANET RAASCH

When it comes to treatment of convicted sex offenders, Americans and the American justice system are very concerned. Sex offenders are seen as targeting the most vulnerable populations, especially women and children. They are often subject to longer prison terms and closer supervision once released than other kinds of offenders.

Currently, there are about 747,500 registered sex offenders in the United States. About one-third of these individuals are currently under close supervision, in prison or jail, in halfway houses or on probation. The rest have returned, unsupervised, to the community.

Low Rate of Recidivism
While in the criminal justice system, convicted sex offenders are required to undergo an array of treatments intended to deter them from re-offending. As a result of incarceration and treatment, only 5.3 percent of all sex offenders re-offend upon release (although those convicted of violent offenses re-offend more often). This rate is much lower than the rate for all other categories of convicts.
- Many more recidivism (re-offense) studies here.

Nonetheless, citizens want to make sure that they and their children are protected against the perceived danger of convicted sex offenders. Offenders who have exited the criminal justice system want to return to a normal life. These goals are starkly opposed.

Sex Offenders Must Register
In the United States, there are a variety of sex offender registration and notification systems. Generally, sex offenders are required to register with law enforcement of any state, locality, territory or tribe within which they reside, work and attend school.

The U.S. Congress in 1994 passed the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, which required all 50 states to maintain a registry of sex offenders’ addresses so that their whereabouts would be known to local law enforcement agencies. Concerned residents can consult these registries.

Registration ranges from 10 years to the convicted sex offender’s lifetime. Recent legislation in some states requires that offenders also reveal their email addresses, chat room IDs and instant-messaging aliases. In some states, offenders must wear ankle bracelets as long as they are registered.

Communities Must Notify
Megan’s Law” in 1996 amended the Wetterling Act to allow for community notification. This mandated that law enforcement personnel proactively disclose registry information to neighborhood residents about sex offenders who live in close proximity. Landlords must include information about how to use the registry in their lease documents.

Some states notify the public only about sex offenders who pose a high risk to the community, but others employ broad notification practices and distribute information about all registered sex offenders. Community notification strategies can include press releases, flyers and door-to-door warnings about the presence of sex offenders.

Recent developments include the mandate that states sponsor Internet websites listing convicted sex offenders and, via the 2007 Adam Walsh Act, the establishment of a national online sex offender registry that allows a search beyond state borders.

Under the Adam Walsh Act, registered sex offenders must avoid by 500 to 2,500 feet all schools, bus stops, gyms, recreation centers, playgrounds, parks, swimming pools, libraries, nursing homes and places of worship.

Jumat, 25 Januari 2013

MN - Report: Hundreds of Sex Offenders Released Before Completing Treatment

Original Article

01/24/2013

By Steve Tellier

Hundreds of convicted sex offenders are ordered to complete treatment while in prison but are released without doing so. And even the Minnesota Department of Corrections admits those convicts are more likely to commit another sexual crime once they're back on the street.

"The department is very concerned about the risk of all sex offenders," said Steve Allen, the director of behavioral health sciences at the DOC.

That concern was clear in a new DOC report presented to the legislature last week. It states that in Minnesota, there are about 1,800 sex offenders behind bars who are supposed to complete a treatment program before being released. But only one in three ever enter that treatment, let alone complete it. A 2010 DOC report showed those who are released before participating in treatment are about six percent more likely to commit another sexual crime.

"That really is a disappointing figure," said Donna Dunn, the executive director of the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault. "We know that sex offender treatment can work and does work. We know that that is something that is incredibly important for offenders to go through. When that doesn't happen, we know that public safety is compromised."

The DOC does make sure the most serious offenders are the ones who get spots in the prison treatment program, and the ones who don't are passed on to community-based treatment and supervision after they're released.

"The research tells us to put the resources where the risk is," Allen said.

The problem is that resources are lacking.

"We would need funding to expand our treatment," Allen said.

The DOC's budget has recently remained flat, and Gov. Mark Dayton's budget proposal doesn't include any additional cash.

"Preventing sexual violence has got to be a priority," Dunn said.

The chair of the House Public Safety Finance and Policy committee, Rep. Michael Paymar (DFL-St. Paul), said the legislature is looking for ways to get the DOC more money and resources for offender treatment.

Senin, 24 September 2012

OK - Oklahoma, ahead of the times in re-integrating sex offenders into society

Original Article

09/24/2012

By Ben Allen

Sex offender, the mere mention of the word can turn even the most pleasant conversation into one filled with anger. Questions like ‘How could they?’ and ‘Why would they?’ inevitably come up. And those who commit the crimes often face years in prison. But if and when they get out, what greets them on the outside?

Before we get there, we should start here.

Sex offender: it includes everything from felony rape to inappropriate touching. But all the crimes get grouped together. If you’re a registered child sex offender, a 2008 law barred you from living within 2,000 feet of a school, park, or day care

Any metro area of Oklahoma, they’re not going to be allowed to live in. So you have to think rural when you begin to reintegrate them, almost from the beginning. When I say rural, I’m saying at a minimum the outskirts of a metro town or city.”

Floyd Long is transition coordinator for the state’s Department of Corrections. He works to get the worst of the worst integrated into society, so they can contribute whatever is possible. He tries to find them housing, a job, and transportation, with the help of family.

The ability to buy a car, your metro transportation, your bus systems do not go out to the metro areas. So it becomes a big challenge when it comes to transportation.”

Thus it becomes a challenge to get employment because they can’t get to their job. So it kinda snowballs, there’s a snowball effect that begins to occur.”



Inside the Crossings Community Center, just north of Lake Hefner, non-profit leaders, DOC staff, religious leaders, and interested volunteers, all came together a couple weeks ago to get a sense of the problem.

If anything it’s going to get worse…

This is one of the few conferences in the country devoted to the topic. Steve Gordon heads the Oklahoma Partnership for Successful Reentry and organized the gathering of about 50. That’s fifty people trying to help hundreds of sex offenders due out this year…

We want to get that dialogue started. Dialogue with each other, dialogue with the powers that be, dialogue with the community and the two biggest challenges, nothing personal against you, but the media and public opinion.”

But yet here in Oklahoma, a state often cited in national media as backwards and behind the times, a discussion about what can be done. Why?

We have a very strong faith community in Oklahoma and a lot of the churches have been stepping up. And then if they really are sensitive to the needs, the hardest reentry of anybody is the sex offender.”

Nobody wants to help them, they’ve typically burned their bridges. And so it takes someone with a great heart of mercy even to want to look at them. They’re the lepers of society.”


I’m out on a walk with John at Hand Up Ministries in southwest Oklahoma City.

A registered sex offender from California, he now works full time for the ministry. John got out of jail in 1994 and has been in Oklahoma for years. An enthusiastic, eternally optimistic guy, he seems to take the best possible view of the situation he put himself in. But he’s fighting his registration requirements because of the stigma..

I believe if a person lives like me, I’ve been out for twenty years, why shouldn’t I be able to?

John points to studies that show the recidivism rate at somewhere between 5 and 15 percent for sex offenders, far below the average for most other crimes.

Everyone I talked to described a snowball effect. They have trouble finding a place to live, then they don’t have access to transportation, and so they can’t even try to interview for a job, where there’s a whole another set of barriers. Wayne Bowers works with CURE-SORT, devoted to sex offender reentry.

I think all of a sudden, there’s beginning to be more and more people who are speaking out. When I moved here, I was worried. I thought ‘Am I really getting into something?’. But I’m encouraged to see there is a lot of place for growth here.”

But how does this affect you and me? Lately, the default position has been to wall sex offenders off. Well, Steve Gordon says some are starting to realize why that often doesn’t work…

It’s making the public less safe because right now in Oklahoma County, we have 120 homeless sex offenders because there’s no place for them to go. That’s not good. Everybody I talk to, no matter what their background or what their profession, they say that’s a bad thing.”

But in the back of Steve Gordon’s mind, there’s the question of the standards these programs are held to.

We can have the best reentry policies, the best reentry concepts and systems, they will not work. All we need is one angry citizen going up onto the steps of Legislature pitching a fit and it will undue years of good work we’ve been trying to do.”

That’s all it came down to in the day-long conference. The best programs could struggle to compete with one of the most powerful motivators: fear. A solution to that is far more difficult.

Listen:

Jumat, 21 September 2012

WI - Lawmakers consider changes to sex predator law

Original Article

09/21/2012

By Gilman Halsted

A legislative council committee is considering changes to the state's sex predator law. The committee heard testimony from prosecutors and defense attorneys at a hearing in Madison Wednesday.

The committee is trying to tweak the law, while still protecting both public safety and the rights of an offender to be released someday. Milwaukee County prosecutor Holly Bunch told the committee there is a problem with the new risk assessment tool used. She says it is making it much easier for people who have been committed as predators under Chapter 980 to be released without supervision, even if they refuse to accept treatment while they are confined. "This has been most disturbing to me in cases where a person has been a treatment refuser, has sat there doing nothing, when the whole point of Chapter 980 is treatment, and then somehow gets rewarded for a change in the science. My perspective is that leopards just don't generally change their spots."

A defense attorney who represents people committed under the sex predator law disagrees. Vincent Rust works in the La Crosse public defender’s office. He said, "What she's [Bunch’s] saying is that the risk continues over a life span. Well, I think in a way it's just common sense. I don't think that we need to test it. If a guy commits a rape when he's 25, he's going to be less risky when he's 60, and that's what the empirical studies show."

Rust agrees with prosecutors that the law is not treating people fairly now. He says there needs to be more of an incentive for offenders to accept treatment both in the institution and in the community once they are released. The committee plans to propose changes to the law next year.