New Life Style

Tampilkan postingan dengan label 17YearsOld. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label 17YearsOld. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 07 Februari 2014

TX - Registered Sex Offender Speaks Out

Registered Sex Offender Speaks Out
Original Article

See the video at the link above.

02/06/2014

By Christina Coleman

New law makes it easier for registered sex offenders to get jobs by removing their place of employment from the sex registry.

However, one register sex offender is speaking out for more change.

He says law enforcement should only have access to the registry.

This man who doesn't want to be identified says he was charged with sexual assault in 1991.

He says he was 17-years-old when the 16-year-old girl he was dating claimed he sexually assaulter her.

He says he's innocent, but plead no contest because he was scared.

He says he didn't know his name would end up on a sex offender registry for the rest of his life.

He wants law enforcement to only have access to the registry to protect himself and his family.

Registered sex offenders still have to put their home address on the sex offender registry.

Senin, 28 Oktober 2013

Is there any help for an offender being harassed/threatened?

Letter
The following was sent to us via the contact form and posted with the users permission.

By RS:
My fiance is a sex offender. He was 17 & charged with sex with a minor (she was 14) and he was emancipated by his dad. He got in a lot of trouble stealing cars, etc... so he got 2 yrs. in county and 10 in prison. Served his time and got out march 31,2010. Has not been in any trouble. We stay to ourselves. Anyways, the little town we stay in is becoming a lot of trouble for us. Being harassed by locals all hours. Constant knocking, threats of death and more. Of course we want to move but no money. The sheriffs dept has failed us. More or less has refused help. Says we need to catch them ourselves. Says we are making it all up. Tells us to shut up. As soon as they know it is us calling they take 1 or more hours to show up or not at all. Is there any help out there for my fiance and me?

Selasa, 22 Oktober 2013

TX - Some fear ban on sex offenders has unintended consequences

Juvenile sex offenders
Original Article

10/22/2013

By Cory Smith

SAN ANTONIO - A San Antonio dad fears a ban on sex offenders in city parks would keep him from taking his two children to the park.

The man was arrested for sexually assaulting his 16-year-old girlfriend.

Although he was 17 when he was arrested, the man was tried and convicted as an adult two years later, and is now a registered sex offender.

He’s now in his 40s, married, and has two children.

I'm not a threat to any children,” he said. “I want to be able to be a regular person. I served my time.”

The man’s wife said the city’s potential ban on sex offenders entering into or living near city parks has unintended consequences.

I think my children deserve a chance at a normal future, just like other families out there,” she said. “Just because of a mistake my husband made when he was 17? He's done his probation, served his time, paid his dues. I think we should be able to move on.”

Mary Sue Molnar, the executive director of Texas Voices for Reason and Justice, said there is little evidence to suggest that the city needs such an ordinance.

We've had conversations with several city council members and expressed our interest in looking at the research. We're hoping that they look at the research,” she said. “We've not found any (evidence) that supports the fact, or the idea, or theory, that residency restrictions or child-safe zones keep the public safer.”

City officials said the ordinance would likely have some exemptions, but have yet to comment on a case like this.

The ordinance is scheduled to go before the city council’s public safety committee, before the full council will get a chance to weigh in.

See Also:

Selasa, 24 April 2007

Bill that trapped teen is misused

View the article here

This article is not from me, which it looks like it is, but is not.

04/23/2007

In the mid-1990s, as a then-state representative, I introduced a bill designed to increase punishment for the most horrendous of acts against children. It was entitled The Child Protection Act of 1995.

Despite being in the Republican minority, I was close friends with the then-governor, speaker and lieutenant governor, all of whom were Democrats. My bill sailed out of the House and reached the state Senate.

In the Senate the bill hit a snag. The chairperson of the committee to which the bill was assigned wanted a bill to raise Georgia's age of consent from 14 to 16 years of age. Although I am not assigning blame, the bill became victim of the ultimate legislative "Catch 22," in which one bill couldn't pass without the other.

When the bill came to the House floor for final approval, many bright minds such as then-state Rep. Roy Barnes and former Speaker Tom Murphy expressed concerns that young people, much like in the current case of Genarlow Wison, might be sentenced to the harsh 10-year prison term originally intended for blatant and extreme cruelty and abuse of children. Ultimately, most members came to believe that the language was vague enough to give leeway and that no prosecutor would ever so abuse the statute and its true legislative intent.

Years after I left the legislature, I learned certain prosecutors were using the bill as a "catchall" to win cases in which an older teen had consensual sex with an underaged teen. The legislature addressed that problem a few years ago, but the bill was not retroactive for cases like Wilson's.

In Wilson's case, the jury determined he was not guilty of rape. Instead, the underage sex combined with the involvement of oral sex triggered the more stringent portion of the legislation. Sadly, legislators advocating that no relief be given to Wilson and others showed their colleagues an uncensored version of a tape Wilson and his friends made of the "party" at which the sexual encounter occurred. Distasteful and sickening? I would imagine so for those who watched. Irrelevant? Yes. Wilson was cleared of rape by the jury.

Ironically, former Lt. Gov. Pierre Howard, who defeated me in the 1990 general election, joined me in an effort to convince legislators that it was not our intent to send young people to jail for 10 years.

We both feared that many of those prosecuted and convicted under the law often come from disadvantaged or minority homes where the family unit and its guidance is sometimes not available to young men, much less the resources of a strong legal defense.

Apparently there remains some opportunity to review Wilson's case through the judicial process. I want to make it clear that this column is not designed to place unfair pressure on officials who might be involved. I trust they will do what is right in the end.

But for years now, I have tried every way in the world to point out that the ultimate determining factor in applying legislation is the legislative intent. And the Wilson case result was not our intent.

Former state Rep. Matt Towery of Atlanta is a syndicated columnist and CEO of InsiderAdvantage, a political information and polling firm.